Toronto International College Canada
Article History: | Received: 10.09.2021 | Accepted: 20.09.2021 | Published: 30.09.2021|
Abstract: Dr. David E Martin has declared that it is illegal to patent nature, but that didn’t stop the NIH and CDC from doing just that. Not only did these agencies make an illegal patent application for a coronavirus taken from nature, which had been altered in a lab using gain-of-function research applications to produce SARS-CoV-2, for which a patent application was made, but these government agencies also patented the PCR test used to detect the SARS-CoV-2, as well as the mRNA vaccine that was devised with the ostensible aim of defeating it. This is Hegelian—problem, reaction, solution—dialectics applied to health science, where the health authorities create the disease bioweapon pathogen in a lab, introduce it into the general population to cause a pandemic reaction, and then provide a one-size-sits-all-medical solution in the form of an alleged “vaccine,” which is actually a transhumanist experiment in the form of a gene therapy disguised as an inoculating jab. Given that WHO announced that there was a worldwide pandemic March 15, 2020, the fact that Fauci was already resolving on all the social distancing and lockdown measures two days later, as the text of the email to actor Morgan Fairchild reveals, shows that he is beholden to and in complete lockstep with WHO. Far from behaving like the head of a national health agency of the U.S., he is behaving more like a puppet of the world government behemoth that has imposed a dictatorship upon the world since the beginning of this so-called health emergency, taking the CCP lead by adopting all the measures that were implemented in China as the agreed upon protocol. What does this reveal? That this is a communist coup upon the world and all of our governments are captured. It also reveals that the world government bodies from the UN to WHO to WEF are all in cahoots with China and share its totalitarian agenda and ideology.
Keywords: illegal to patent nature, SARS-CoV-2, “vaccine,”.
Image is Available in PDF Format
Image is Available in PDF Format
“It would be great if you could tweet to your many Twitter followers,” Dr. Anthony Fauci responded to Fairchild. “The American public should not be frightened, but should be prepared to mitigate an outbreak in this country by measures including social distancing, teleworking, temporary closure of schools, etc.”
The emails reveal him sparring over an antiviral drug with Ezekiel Emanuel, a former Obama administration health adviser, fielding questions about vaccines, and receiving an update from Mark Zuckerberg on Facebook’s plans for a coronavirus “information hub.” Zuckerberg also asked whether the social media company could provide resources to accelerate vaccine testing. And Fauci even responded to an offer from actor Morgan Fairchild to use her Twitter account on his behalf.i
Given that WHO announced that there was a worldwide pandemic March 15, 2020, the fact that Fauci was already resolving on all the social distancing and lockdown measures two days later, as the text of the email to Fairchild reveals, shows that he is beholden to and in complete lockstep with WHO. Far from behaving like the head of a national health agency of the U.S., he has acted more like a puppet of the world government behemoth that has imposed a dictatorship upon the world since the beginning of this so-called health emergency, taking the CCP lead by adopting all the measures that were implemented in China as the agreed upon protocol. What does that reveal? That this is a communist coup upon the world and all of our governments are captured. It also reveals that the world government bodies from the UN to WHO to WEF are all in cahoots with China and share its totalitarian agenda and ideology.
Image is Available in PDF Format
The emails show Fauci received a flurry of correspondence about the theory that the SARS-CoV-2 virus leaked from a lab in Wuhan. One such email sent to Fauci on April 16, 2020 by Francis Collins, the director of the NIAID, under the subject line “conspiracy gains momentum” contained a link to a news story highlighting a Fox News report that said the allegation had merit. Fauci’s response to Collins is entirely blacked out. Why is it redacted? What are they hiding? Such redactions should not be tolerated. It is actually against the law. If the ordinary citizen did it, they would be charged with tampering with evidence or obstruction of justice, but the government is allowed to get away with it because it is the government. The government tampers with evidence all the time. Files are shredded and government text is redacted on a routine basis. Then, there is the government’s tampering with crime scenes like that of the Alfred P. Murrah Building in Oklahoma City or the WTC Twin Towers on 9/11, when the hard, physical evidence of the crime scene wreckage was removed with unseemly haste on both occasions. Why are these abuses of power tolerated? Why is the government allowed to get away with it? People will say because it is the government. It doesn’t matter. The government should be held to account. The citizens have to rattle the cage relentlessly and never stop until justice is done.
The Buzzfeed report also shows that Fauci’s emails reveal his ambivalence toward his newfound celebrity status, but the fact that he has given the nod to a documentary crew who would tell his story. This has the look of feigned humility and socially acceptable public posturing. Additionally, the emails appear to show that the level of personal responsibility he is under is considerable and that the pandemic has exacted a toll on his private life. In one email sent on Feb. 18, weeks before the WHO declared the outbreak a global pandemic, he complained that he had not been able to spend sufficient time with his wife.
Some of the emails were reviewed by the Trump White House before being turned over to BuzzFeed News. The released emails represent just a portion of what was requested in the FOIA petition. They are filled with redactions, making them an incomplete record of Fauci’s correspondence. This would come as no surprise to anyone, but what should make us wonder is why we continue to refer to countries that do this as democracies, while vilifying so-called dictatorships like China for doing the same thing. Our governments are not behaving as democracies should and the uncharacteristic behavior is growing worse by the year to the point where our countries are no longer recognizable.
The Buzzfeed Report notes how the emails appear to portray Fauci as being ‘courteous’, ‘low-key’, and ‘empathetic’. It’s called political savviness and he is well trained and good at it. He has been groomed well for the position by the Deep State, and though he is supposed to be a deep cover agent, they blew it. He has been exposed. And the reason he has been exposed is that 7.8 billion people have been affected by this criminal fraud, resulting in a good percentage of that number doing their homework. Everyone has their unique gifts. Some people are good at researching the political side, other people follow the money, but a lot of dirt has emerged about a lot of people and Fauci is one of them. He has not helped his position either because of inconsistencies and being caught in his own lies. In short, it is usually the tangled web woven by the criminal that causes him to get caught in his own web of deceit. And right now, Fauci is looking more like the fly caught in the web than the spider responsible for weaving it in the first place.
Hence, it is not so much genuine politeness that causes Fauci to respond to emails with appropriate aplomb, but political savviness. It is this savviness which prompts him, when health professionals write him with harsh criticism of Trump’s handling of the pandemic, to reply with a simple “thank you,” in order to avoid any unnecessary political fallout.
Image is Available in PDF Format
The Buzzfeed report also notes how, in spite of employing politically savviness to avoid controversy, Fauci often defends his actions in the face of criticism.
Gregg Gonzalves is a case in point. Fauci received an email from Gonzalves, a prominent Yale School of Public Health epidemiologist, urging the NIAID director and his team to act promptly to contain the virus. The tone of Gonzalves’ email displays unmistakable frustration and annoyance at the mishandling of the pandemic response: “For those I know, I don’t doubt your commitment to public service,” Gonsalves writes, expressing his dissatisfaction. “But time is running out. We need vocally, unequivocal leadership now, that offers real guidance to communities about what to do, what might happen next.”
Image is Available in PDF Format
Fauci appeared outraged at the suggestion that his health team’s response was influenced by the political values of the Trump administration, as well he might, when he is actually taking his orders from the WHO, heading a national health dictatorship at the behest of an international health coup.
“Gregg: I am surprised you included me in your note,” he wrote. “I genuflect to no one but science and always, always speak my mind when it comes to public health. I have consistently corrected misstatements by others and will continue to do so.”ii
This response is entirely disingenuous, since Fauci does indeed genuflect when it comes to those in power, definitely not the Trump administration, but more accurately his bosses in Rome, namely the Jesuit Order of the Catholic Church, the body, which at heart is the most likely entity to have coordinated the whole conspiracy given its history of operations.
Image is Available in PDF Format
Image is Available in PDF Format
Fauci has been at the helm addressing some of the world’s most difficult health and infectious disease crises, ranging from HIV/AIDS, Ebola, and Zika. It is interesting that he has been in position during all these crises, when in each case, the viruses emerged from bioweapons programs. Placing him in charge is rather like having the fox guarding the henhouse. Not only was Fauci responsible for the transfer of gain-of-function technology to the Wuhan National Institute of Virology, but he is also responsible for recommending many of the harmful responses to the disease pandemic threat, including the use of masks, which cause bacteriological infections and lower blood oxygen levels among wearers; the use of hand sanitizers, many of which contain methanol instead of ethanol, which is toxic; social distancing, which is psychologically harmful; shelter-in-place measures, which are psychologically and physically harmful; vaccinations with vaccines containing toxic spike proteins, which cause an array of autoimmune disease responses that ultimately lead to infertility, cytokine storm events, and death.
Indeed, the whole plandemic has employed Hegelian dialectics in a problem-reaction-solution scheme, that sees Fauci heading up the problem with the creation of a gain-of-function enhanced virus which has been weaponized to be more virulent and pathogenic. Putting him in charge of the pandemic response is like putting a mob boss in charge of an investigation into his own criminal activities.
Deep State fixer and master of operational coverups, Philip Zelikow, former Executive Director of the Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, informally referred to as the 9/11 Commission, has been placed in charge of the CoViD-19 Commission Planning Group, according to the University of Virginia, which intends to provide its Miller Center for Public Affairs as the group’s base to “Help America and the world learn from this pandemic and safeguard against future threats.”
Zelikow’s “non-partisan” group includes Event 201 participants, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security at the Bloomberg School of Public Health. Event 201, it will be remembered, was the “germ game” dress rehearsal exercise held in October of 2019 as a practice drill for the CoViD-19 plandemic. This is perfect Hegelian problem-reaction-solution dialectics, consisting of those in charge of the problem now being placed at the helm of the solutional coverup of the greatest crime against humanity ever perpetrated in the history of the world. Far from being “non-partisan,” this whitewash committee will exert the same control over the narrative that has been displayed since the beginning of this heinous crime. Funded by Schmidt Futures, headed by Bilderberger Eric Schmidt, the Skoll Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation and, which is Charles Koch’s philanthropic organization, the event is well supported by Deep State insiders and members of the cabal.
Zelikow’s hope is that this committee will lead directly to a future National CoViD-19 Commission, set up either by the White House or Congress.
Besides serving on President George W. Bush’s transition team in 2000-2001 and then on his Post-9/11 Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, “some catastrophic and catalysing event - like a new Pearl Harbor” as a pretext for launching the Project for the New American Century.
Zelikov was a Neo-Con and White House insider under the administration of George W. Bush, who co-authored a book with Condaleezza Rice called To Build a Better World: Choices to End the Cold War and Create a Global Commonwealth. Rice, it should be remembered, was placed in charge of a wargame exercise involving the simulated hijacking of passenger airliners to be used as guided missiles to attack prominent landmarks in the U.S. This wargame exercise granted cover for the 9/11 operation to ensure that the U.S. Air Force and the security agencies of the U.S. were distracted by the wargame decoy exercise being held the same week as the September 11 attacks, so that when the wargame went live and real planes became involved, drill participants became confused and suffered from response paralysis. Yet, Rice denied that the U.S. government had any concept of such a scenario ever taking place, and were caught completely off-guard on 9/11.
What this means is that Zelikow was involved in the problem-reaction-solution strategy game from the beginning, as a member of the team responsible for planning the wargame drill exercise involving a plane hijacking simulation. Then, he headed up the commission charged with covering up the entire 9/11 government-led operation by being placed in charge of the inquiry, an investigation that never asked the right questions of the right people, and which, far from functioning as an inquiry, facilitated a complete whitewash.
For the reasons already stated, he performed his role as the Executive Director of the Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States aka 9/11 Commission, following the rejection of Henry Kissinger, whose deep unpopularity caused even .
As James Corbett put it, “He certainly absolutely fulfilled his role as Executive Director of the 9/11 Cover-Up Commission by facilitating the cover-up. And how did he do that? He directed who the Commission talked to, under what circumstances, what they talked about, what they didn’t talk about and what, ultimately ended up in the final report.”
Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States“It was so ridiculous, that even the 9/11 Commission staff, themselves internally parodied this and started sending around a parody draft outline of the Report of the President’s Commission on the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy aka the Warren Commission Report called the ‘Pre-Emptive Outline.’”
One of the headlines in this parody “Warren Commission Report” was, “Single Bullet: We Haven’t Seen the Evidence Yet but Really, We’re Sure.”
Corbett goes on to add, “So that’s the person that they’re going to put in charge of this preliminary to the National COVID Commission. Uh, yeah. I think we know where this is trending but here’s an important part of this story that might might get excluded, so let’s not exclude it: One of Zelikow’s specialties—his self-professed specialties—is ‘public myth’, the creation and management of public myth.
“He, himself brags that this is his specialty and in a 1998 article on public myths, Zelikow identified “generational myths that are formed by those pivotal events that become etched in the minds of those who have lived through them.”
“Absolutely, top-to-bottom, this is outrageous and disgusting! I hope people will actually read through this University of Virginia puff piece to see what he’s talking about, ‘Oh, we’re going to have to get into private firms and non-profit entities and hospitals and pharmaceutical firms. They all have a role to play and they’ve all made responses to this disaster.’
“This is the way that they form the response to these ‘generation-changing’ kind of events and so this is where the real action of all of this really comes, is when they start hardwiring it in through these types of things.
“Absolutely disgusting! Top-to-bottom! That was a mouthful that barely scrapes the surface. If you are interested in more, please type ‘Zelikow’ into the search bar, on corbettreport.com and you’ll find a number of reports, including mypiece, all about Philip Zelikow and how he ran the 9/11 Cover-Up Commission and a podcast episode I did, called …
As with the War on Drugs, the War on Terror, and the War on HIV/AIDS, the tactical teams that were ostensibly meant to fight these scourges engaged in duplicitous double-dealing, exacerbating the problem quite by design. For instance, it was L.A. Times reporter Gary Webb who discovered that the DEA was engaged in peddling the very drugs they were supposed to be taking off the streets, dying for his trouble in a contract killing called a ‘suicide’ when he was found with two gunshot two wounds in the head.
The War on Terror has been no less duplicitous and hypocritical with government agencies recruiting dupes and patsies from local militias as well as mosques to set them up in counterterrorist operations to take the blame and fall for a terrorist plot they would never even have been involved with had it not been set up by the alphabet soup agency in charge, whether it’s the FBI, CIA, ATF, DoD. The patsy set up as the terrorist will then be arrested without the normal protections afforded a suspect, i.e. the right to remain silent (very often tortured instead to extract a confession), the right to fair representation, the right to a fair trial, the right to be tried by a jury of one’s peers. All of these rights went by the wayside in the face of post-9/11 legislation like the Patriot Act, an act which is far from patriotic, since it utterly demolishes the U.S. Bill of Rights and skewers the once inalienable rights accorded U.S. citizens and their counterparts in the so-called free world. The other Five Eye nations, the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, have basically followed in lockstep. It even became possible to extract confessions for those labelled “terrorists” through torture, something the courts of any democratic nation should deem inadmissible as evidence, since a completely innocent person would confess to a crime under torture as readily as the actual suspect, since torture is a form of duress capable of making anyone confess.
If that wasn’t enough the War on HIV/AIDS called for antiretroviral medications called AZT drug cocktails, a chemotherapy drug initially issued to cancer patients, but which was found to induce dangerous side effects and to be so reactive that it was shelved in the 1970s, only to brought back into circulation when the scourge of HIV/AIDS appeared. As with CoViD-19, the death certificates for patients placed on AZT drug cocktails listed HIV/AIDS as the cause of death, when the real cause was ‘medically’ induced poisoning of the patients with AZT drug cocktails, which caused an array of harmful side effects, leading to medically induced immune deficiency, kidney and liver complications, organ failure and death. However, instead of adverse reactions to AZT being cited as the cause. HIV/AIDS was identified as the killer in each and every case. In Canada alone, the spike in HIV/AIDS stats just happened to coincide with the period during which AZT drug cocktails were prescribed as the treatment of choice.
Like Zelikow, Fauci has been chosen to head the response to the CoViD-19 medical emergency because the best person to be placed in charge of the response to the CoViD-19 outbreak is the person responsible for orchestrating the biological attack on the civilian population of the U.S. and the world in the first place. No one is better placed to cover the perpetrators’ tracks, conceal evidence, obstruct justice, derail investigations, sidetrack inquiries, and coverup the crime than the perpetrator himself.
Just a day after the first reported CoViD-19 death in the U.S., the managing editor of ABC News’ medical unit emailed Fauci and asked him if he agreed with what a source at the Department of Homeland Security had told him: that epidemiology models showed that 98 million people could be infected with CoViD-19 and deaths from the virus could reach as high as 500,000.
On May 5, 2020, Mary Harris, an NIAID employee, wrote: “I am grateful to say my Director is Dr. Anthony Fauci and share with my family, friends, and church that if you said it, it’s gospel.”
Mary Harris’s blind worship of authority pretty much epitomizes the sycophantic nature and sheep mentality of subordinates lower on the pecking order at all levels of the hierarchy. Very few people are willing to poke their head above the parapet, but are far more likely to keep it buried in the sand. Very few people are willing to question someone of higher rank in our so-called free societies. They comply out of fear, afraid of being disciplined or fired for insubordination. In addition, they are brainwashed to respect the talking heads, the white coats and those in authority, or even those with deeper pockets. No shallower or stupider animal than the North American-raised and miseducated citizen has been envisioned in the history of the world. Our governments have done a superlative job of rendering our population braindead through fluoride in the water and neurotoxins in the vaccines. The rest of the mission has been accomplished with the idiot box, which has facilitated the devolution of our kind, which has become regressively stupider in two generations since the advent of public television till the brain has been so addled as to be reduced to mashed potatoes.
All the while, celebrity status was being foisted upon an embarrassed Fauci. Barely two months into the pandemic, merchandizers were capitalizing on the star status Fauci was garnering, with T-shirts, bobbleheads, socks, and even prayer candles being merchandized and sold featuring the grinning face of the NIH director. Fauci’s emails show he was clearly uncomfortable with all the attention he received.
“Click on the ‘Cuomo Crush’ and ‘Fauci Fever’ link below. It will blow your mind. Our society is really totally nuts,” Fauci wrote in an April 8, 2020 email he forwarded to undisclosed recipients after he received a Google alert about news stories mentioning his name.
The previous month, a colleague had emailed Fauci a Washington Post article headlined “Fauci Socks, Fauci Doughnuts, Fauci Fan Art: The Coronavirus Experts Attract a Cult Following.” The top of the article tells the story of a Rochester, New York, shop that had sold out of donuts with Fauci’s face on them.
“Truly surrealistic,” Fauci wrote. “Hopefully this all stops soon.” Later, he added: “It is not at all pleasant, that is for sure.”
The emails also reveal behind-the-scenes negotiations over a documentary about Fauci’s work. He first sent a note to his team about the project on April 12, a month after WHO had declared the coronavirus a pandemic.
“Let us discuss this tomorrow before we do anything. No one has any ‘exclusives’ on anything about me,” he wrote to his team.”iv
It would seem from this email that the documentary is a priority to him, that he is self-important enough to concern himself with his image and portrayal. He makes it clear that it is of priority by insisting they discuss it the next day before anything else. This is hardly the reaction of one who wishes to shun cameras or media fanfare. He even comments, “No one has any ‘exclusive’ on anything about me.”
It is reminiscent of Gandhi, who the author of this book co-penned a book about called “Gandhi Under Cross-examination.” Gandhi, who is the same kind of duplicitous double-dealing fraud as Fauci, actually asked his own biographer, Rev. J.J. Doke if he wished him to write part of the biography about him. This is not only a conflict of interest, but shows that Gandhi and Doke are close friends, and Doke’s biography is not written with the objectivity required of a professional biography. In addiction, Gandhi paid for 600 copies of the biography to be printed and then had them sent to major news publications in Europe and North America. This is hardly the image we expect from the prophetic figure Gandhi cut in his loin cloth and staff. Is Fauci the same kind of closet narcissist as Gandhi? Time will tell. It is well known that psychopathic personalities often have narcistic personality disorders.
Fauci’s email below, in reply to one Ms. Allantha Angel, is highly revealing. In the email, Fauci admits that cases of CoViD-19 are heavily skewed by being associated mainly with a high percentage of elderly patients, in addition to co-morbidity factors such as heart disease, chronic lung disease, kidney disease, diabetes, etc. He also admits that most of the pneumonias are what he refers to as “pure viral pneumonias.” In such cases, he admits “and so this vaccine will not help that.” That is an open admission that the CoViD-19 vaccine will be of no benefit and serve no useful purpose for most of the pneumonias encountered. That being the case, why is it being rolled out and universally prescribed as the treatment of choice for defending against CoViD-19 infection, when even Fauci admits it has no efficacy against most of the pneumonias encountered by medical staff?
Image is Available in PDF Format
Anthony Fauci has long been connected to the U.S. government’s bioweapons program. He is a well-trained agent posing as the head of a national health agency. He is a master of Hegelian problem-reaction-solution-dialectics. He is at the heart of the problem, since he was the staunchest promoter of the dual-purpose gain-of-function technology used to create bioweapons like SARS and SARS-CoV-2 in the first place. He has been in charge throughout the reaction phase, with his promotion of mask-wearing, social distancing, lockdowns, mask-wearing, sanitizing, and all the other repressive measures imposed on us by unelected health tsars like himself. He is also at the forefront of the so-called solution—CoViD-19 vaccines—which are no solution at all, but have only exacerbated the problem by creating new variants, prolonging rather than truncating the timeline of the pandemic, while spawning an autoimmune disease response due to the experimental, never before tested mRNA vaccines, which program cells to manufacture spike proteins resembling those found on the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself. Ivermectin is the solution, but the genocidal mad scientists in charge like Fauci, do not want to promote the real solutions, since the fake ones are far more efficient at achieving their population reduction targets, which it is the main purpose of this entire criminal conspiracy.
Fauci defended controversial “gain-of-function” research in 2012, and said the research was worth the risk, even if it precipitated a pandemic.
“In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?” Fauci wrote in an article in the American Society for Microbiology in October 2012, “Scientists working in this field might say—as indeed I have said—that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks.”
Gain-of-function research involves extracting natural virus samples from animals and engineering them to infect humans ostensibly for the purpose of developing therapeutics and vaccines. However, the approach can be used as a cover or smokescreen for more offensive bioweapon development purposes. It’s too tempting to engage in this form of study and not take advantage of the dual-purpose applications. An even more cynical view would hold that the defensive research is a pretext or cover for the more offensive application.
This stunning revelation comes on the heels of researchers raising new questions about the origins of the CoViD-19 virus. It also comes after Dr. Fauci’s recent admission that the NIH sent $600,000 to the WIV for research into the transmissibility of bat coronaviruses to humans, and his recent concession that CoViD-19 may have leaked from a lab when he obstinately adhered to the view that it was natural for over a year. Even Facebook recently made a surprising reversal of policy by discontinuing the practice of banning posts suggesting that CoViD-19 may have originated in a Chinese laboratory. A House GOP report also found that “significant circumstantial evidence raises serious concerns that the CoViD-19 outbreak may have been a leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” and that Fauci’s NIAID funded work there, indirectly through the sub-grant agency EcoHealth Alliance that “appeared to directly or indirectly involve controversial ‘gain of function’ research.”
Gain-of-function research is not only controversial, but two years after Fauci defended it, the Obama administration imposed a moratorium on all gain-of-function research within the U.S., finding it to be too dangerous. However, Fauci, slippery as a greased eel, found a loophole and used NIH grant money to fund gain-of-function research at WIV.v
Fauci may have been directly involved in funding the research that ultimately caused the CoViD-19 pandemic. This chapter will make a case for Fauci, like billionaire Bill Gates, employing Hegelian problem-reaction-solution dialectics to create the problem—the bioweaponized virus—which caused the reaction—a global plandemic-which requires the solution—the introduction of an experimental gene therapy misnamed a “vaccine” designed to eliminate the weak, while achieving the transhumanist metamorphosis of the human race for those who survive.
The 2015 publication of a gain-of-function study that appeared in the journal Nature that details the creation of a chimeric virus certainly raises questions that need answers, but that paper will be analyzed in depth later. However, the researchers made a huge omission that becomes all the more alarming considering the purpose gain-of-function research is meant to serve.
Back in 2012, Fauci encouraged his fellow scientists to engage in gain-of-function research, claiming it was worth the risk. The theory behind such research is that researchers can create close approximations of viruses that may emerge from nature through gain-of-function research. Then, scientists can devise treatments that target likely genetic or protein targets on the chimeric virus. Researchers can then compare a virus’s genetic code to previous viruses that emerged naturally and chimeric viruses created through gain-of-function research. Should a new pathogenic virus emerge from nature, the hope is that they will be able to pre-emptively hold the advantage.
Researchers hope to find common genetic or protein targets in a virus that can be cured by a therapeutic or a vaccine that the scientists hope to develop before an actual outbreak. The argument for justifying such risky gain-of-function research is persuasive, but what if the research were to be hijacked for nefarious purposes, including the development of bioweapons? Without stringent and globally agreed-upon limitations and reporting requirements with the force of international law, one could conclude in contradistinction to Fauci that the risks far outweigh the benefits.
There must be a repository for the relevant information on documented viruses to compare with a newly-discovered one. This tool is a system of cooperative databases that update each other from around the world. The U.S. version is called GenBank. The problem with the 2015 chimeric virus is that, according to an author correction on the 2015 study, published on May 22, 2020, researchers never uploaded the virus information to GenBank:
In the version of this article initially published, the sequence of the mouse adapted SHC015-MA15 virus had not been deposited in GenBank. The sequence has now been deposited in GenBank under accession number MT308984.
If the team made the correction close to the note’s date, that is approximately five years after they created the virus in 2014. This correction seems even more notable when one takes into account the developmental timeline. Following the release of the 2015, an editor’s note appeared by the date March 30, 2020:
30 March 2020 Editors’ note, March 2020: We are aware that this article is being used as the basis for unverified theories that the novel coronavirus causing CoViD-19 was engineered. There is no evidence that this is true; scientists believe that an animal is the most likely source of the coronavirus.
We now know from Dr. Fauci’s emails that officials within the NIH were calling into question the natural outbreak theory and were questioning whether the virus might have had artificial lab origins. It is also apparent that some researchers were warning Fauci of their fears that the virus was manmade. When a FOIA requested the disclosure of Fauci’s emails, authorities redacted most of the contents of an email related to a sensitive conference call, in which the 2015 study may well have been the focus of discussion. The editing of the study appeared following the conference call. It is also uncertain whether researchers actually uploaded information about the virus created in the study to GenBank for the purpose of drawing comparisons between it and CoViD-19 at the time.
A flurry of articles came out to immediately debunk the lab-leak theory. Why the attempt to discredit with such unseemly haste. Methinks they doth protest too much. The naïve public never seems to consider the mercurial speed with which the naysayers turn out these articles aimed at completely discrediting the entirely plausible. Nicholas Wade, a former science reporter for The New York Times, pointed out how conflicted and baseless the most influential articles were as such paid government shills are wont to do. Is this mocker one of the CIA’s mockingbirds? Would you be surprised? One article of the debunking stripe, and published by The Lancet, listed Peter Daszak from EcoHealth Alliance as an author. He funded research at WIV, including the 2015 study, yet denied any conflict of interest. However, there is strong evidence of such a conflict, as will be shown.
Another influential letter included Kristian G. Andersen of the Scripps Research Institute, who had been on copy in some of Fauci’s e-mails that referenced the study. The letter asserted that there was no evidence CoViD-19 was engineered. Wade explained there was also no evidence that it was not:
Unfortunately, this was another case of poor science, in the sense defined above. True, some older methods of cutting and pasting viral genomes retain tell-tale signs of manipulation. But newer methods, called “no-see-um” or “seamless” approaches, leave no defining marks. Nor do other methods for manipulating viruses such as serial passage, the repeated transfer of viruses from one culture of cells to another. If a virus has been manipulated, whether with a seamless method or by serial passage, there is no way of knowing that this is the case. Dr. Andersen and his colleagues were assuring their readers of something they could not know.
After the successful cross-species transmission into mice, which caused significant lung damage according to the 2015 study, Dr. Xie Zhengli decided to research the effects on primates. Simon Wain-Hobson, a virologist at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, noted that the researchers created a novel virus that “grows remarkably well” in human cells. “If the virus escaped, nobody could predict the trajectory,” he said.
Xie’s research proceeded and, in November 2018, she spoke at the School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology at Shanghai Jiao Tong University on the topic of “Studies on Bat Coronavirus and Cross-Species Infection.” The school later deleted reports about the event from the university’s website. There would be no reason for the school to do this unless it or someone important felt that the matter was sensitive and had to be hushed up.
All of these disclosures paint a very troubling picture of something quite untoward going on behind the scenes. One would have to be very naive to believe that the GenBank data for the 2015 chimeric virus is accurate, given the study was the subject of scrutiny at the time researchers took pains to add it to the databank. Add to that a bombshell report that members of the U.S. State Department tried to block an investigation of the origins of CoViD-19 because it “could open a can of worms” and one has all the circumstantial evidence one needs to show that a cover-up has taken place.vi
As for Daszak’s denial of any conflict of interest in EcoHealth Alliance funding research at WIV, his email to Fauci in 2017 would beg to differ. In this highly revealing email, he outlined his collaborative research on a “bat-origin coronavirus” with the WIV’s Xie Zhengli, which included “doing assays to find out if it can infect human cells in the lab.”
Daszak titled the October 2017 email, “Confidential—A new bat-origin coronavirus emerging in pigs in China discovered under our NIAID R01.” Daszak is referencing a $3.7 million grant from Fauci’s NIAID to the organization EcoHealth Alliance with the declared purpose of “understanding the risk of bat coronavirus emergence.” This kind of research cannot be done without gain-of-function applications, as it is only through such research that it becomes possible to experiment with the variables involved in a virus making the evolutionary advance, which enabled it to jump the species barrier. This grant likely led to “gain-of-function” research collaboration with WIV, which is well-known to have ties to the Chinese military. Fauci, Daszak, the NIH and NIAID had to know of such military links. There is no possible way they could not have. Fauci said in one interview that it would have been irresponsible not to do research of these bat viruses, when it was the height of irresponsibility to do such research with an enemy government. Anyone suggesting that it is xenophobic to see China as an enemy of the U.S. would totally on board with critical race theory (CRT) and political correctness, which is ideologically part and parcel of this entire international communist coup orchestrated by corrupt governments colluding with the CCP.
In the email to Fauci and his NIAID colleagues, Daszak, who was recently recused from the Lancet’s CoViD-19 commission, having been judged as unqualified to perform legal duties because of a potential conflict of interest or lack of impartiality, attaches an unpublished paper on a “novel bat-origin Coronavirus” that’s “not known to be zoonotic.”
“We’re also doing assays to find out if it can infect human cells in the lab—so far no evidence of this,” he adds before listing Wuhan researcher Xie Zhengli as a co-Principal Investigator. Not only does this completely negate Fauci’s past attempts to distance his agency both financially and via personnel to the WIV, but it proves gain-of-function research was taking place at WIV, another claim Fauci has repeatedly denied.
Daszak also reveals that he met Fauci “again” on the day he sent the email—October 1, 2017—which just happened to coincide with the opening day of a conference on “Emerging and Re-emerging Viruses.” Fauci delivered the keynote address at the event, where both Daszak and Xie also happened to give public addresses.vii
The text of the email reads as follows:
Dear Dr Fauci and NIAID colleagues,
It was a pleasure to meet you again today. I’ve attached an unpublished paper, currently in the second round of review with Nature that describes a novel bat-origin Coronavirus (SADS-CoV: Swine Acute Diarrhea) Syndrome coronavirus) that recently spilled over into pig farms in Southern China, leading to the death of over 25,000 piglets in 5+ farms in Guandong Province.
The virus originates in the same group of bats as SARS-CoV, and emerged in the same place. It’s not known to be zoonotic (we’ve tested 35+ pig farm workers with an antibody assay and none are positive. The pig farm owners tell us the virus is now under control, thanks to culling and separation of infected herds. It’s not yet known if this virus has appeared elsewhere, but we are looking. We’re also doing assays to find out if it can infect human cells in the lab—so far no evidence of this.
I hope this paper is of interest. You should know that this work was supported by a NIAID RO1 that Erik Stem my is the Program Officer for, and that I’m PI on, with Zhengli Shi as co-PI.
If you want any other information at all, please don’t hesitate to email or call and I’d be happy to come over to NIAID to brief you further. I’ll also let you know if/when it will be published so that we can try to foster some publicity as appropriate.
Daszak’s references in the email prove that Fauci lied to Sen. Rand Paul under oath about his involvement in illegal gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses. Fauci has repeatedly attempted to distance himself from claims that any such research had taken place, feigning ignorance about whatever untoward study might have been going on behind closed doors at WIV. Fauci also says he never sent a penny of American taxpayer money to WIV, which has also been exposed as a blatant and patent lie. Based on the contents of the email, we also now know that Fauci met up with Daszak the same day as the email was sent, which also just happened to coincide with the opening day of a conference on “Emerging and Re-emerging Viruses,” at which Fauci delivered the keynote address. No wonder these viruses keep popping up like a bad penny. The author behind them keeps popping up as the proverbial penny himself, over four administrations in fact, as he likes to boast in his keynote addresses. This is because Deep State agents are so entrenched, the power positions they hold allow them to hang on for a lifetime.
Daszak and Xie also spoke at the gathering, suggesting that they were all not only totally cognizant of was going on, including Fauci, but were in collusion together in the creation of Frankenstein’s chimera monster from the very outset. There is simply no way that Fauci could have been in the dark about the type of research taking place at WIV. In fact, the responsibility for this entire pandemic can be laid right at Fauci’s feet. Had Fauci not funded illegal gain-of-function research, there never would have been a bat coronavirus capable of jumping the species barrier to humans, which means that Fauci is guilty of an array of high crimes biblical in their magnitude, which may account for why the name Fauci in the Sicilian dialect means ‘sickle’, suggesting that he is one of the four horseman of the Apocalypse—Death—bearing the tool of his harvest.
Daszak is likewise complicit, though he would not have been able to conduct his Frankenstein-like chimera experiments were it not for the funding he received at the hands of Fauci. Daszak never disclosed his financial conflicts of interest, which is why he was recused from The Lancet’s CoViD-19 commission. Both Fauci and Daszak are criminals guilty of high crimes for which the full weight of the law should be exercised. Neither of them can be allowed to get away with the crimes of treason, embezzlement, fraud, mass murder and crimes against humanity.ix
On June 21, 2021, the medical journal The Lancet, which published the March 2020 letter from 27 scientists decrying the “lab leak” of CoViD-19 as a xenophobic conspiracy theory, issued an update acknowledging that Peter Daszak, the scientist who organized the publication of the letter, failed to disclose his clear conflict of interest as is required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. This is solid evidence the EcoHealth Alliance is using Daszak in a desperate bid to conceal its role in funding the gain-of-function research at WIV. Fauci is lying. Daszak is a liar. And EcoHealth’s management has committed a series of crimes, not least fraud, high treason, and crimes against humanity.
“In this letter,” The Lancet update states, “the authors declared no competing interests. Some readers have questioned the validity of this disclosure, particularly as it relates to one of the authors, Peter Daszak.”
The Lancet also invited all 27 scientists who signed onto the letter to re-evaluate their competing interests. After it did so, Daszak submitted an updated disclosure statement acknowledging the fact that his sole source of income is from the salary he receives from EcoHealth Alliance. No conflict of interests to worry about there, since EcoHealth Alliance was the sub-grant agency of the NIH that was funding WIV’s research on coronaviruses, including gain-of-function research. Daszak has understandably since been removed from The Lancet’s CoViD-19 commission.x
In a Senate hearing, Fauci told lawmakers the U.S. had granted $600,000 in funding to WIV over a five-year period, but documents provided by the DHHS show the true number was a third higher than that. Reports obtained by Judicial Watch, found that, between 2014 and 2019, $826,277 was provided by the NIH and NIAID under Fauci’s directive to the Wuhan lab.
Under hardline senate hearing grilling by Republicans, the infectious disease Fauci admitted that the NIH, under whose authority the NIAID operates, provided $600,000 to WIV for studies on the bat coronavirus.
The documents reveal that funds were provided over a six-year period for “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence” by the NIAID through the non-profit EcoHealth Alliance.
Emails obtained through the FOIA show top NIAID officials Dr. Emily Erbelding, Dr. Cristina Cassetti, and Principal Deputy Director Hugh Auchincloss communicated about plans to fund the WIV over a six-year period, which began back in 2019.
The grant was again provided by Peter Daszak, president of the New York City-based EcoHealth Alliance, to the tune of $750,000, $76,301 of which had been issued in 2019.
“This is higher but not extraordinarily higher than I originally indicated,” Auchincloss said in an April 13, 2020 email to Fauci. The communication regarding the EcoHealth Alliance funding indicates that the top disease specialist was aware of the grants provided to the WIV.
An email two days later marked “high” importance from the Principal Deputy Director of NIH Lawrence Tabak to Fauci, along with other NIH officials, warned that Republicans in the Senate were fuming about taxpayer dollars being diverted to fund gain-of-function research at WIV.
The email was given the subject line, “HEADS UP: Wuhan lab research.”
Many congressional Republicans believe the virus was leaked from WIV, resulting in a global pandemic, a theory now given more weight after President Biden’s recent call for an investigation into the origins of the virus. ‘Leak’ makes it sound like an accident, but it is quite deliberate, planned in advance over many years, and intended to evolve into the worldwide scourge it has become.
Rand Paul recently interrogated Fauci on his role in the authorship and release of the SARS-CoV-2 bioweapon. The interrogation was spirited and Paul did his best to circle the wagons on Fauci in the interview, but like most psychopaths, Fauci was unflappable and unmoved even at the most heated moments of the interrogation, being devoid of emotion or empathy, while being well-trained in the art of obfuscation, deflection, and concealment. The simple fact is that he is a well-trained deep cover Deep State agent, who was handpicked to be the last on the suspect list simply because he is in charge of the U.S. government’s response to the plague of the millennium. Who would have ever thought it would be him? Who would have ever believed it possible? However, Rand Paul’s undisputable facts, presented in the course of interrogation, make it clear that a transfer of funds was made to fund gain-of-function research at WIV.
Sen. Rand Paul: Dr. Fauci, we don’t know whether the pandemic started in a lab in Wuhan or evolved naturally, but we should want to know. Three million people have died from this pandemic and that should cause us to explore all possibilities. Instead, government authorities, self-interested gain-of-function research say there’s nothing to see here. Gain-of-function research, as you know, is juicing up naturally occurring animal viruses to infect humans. To arrive at the truth, the U.S. government should admit that the Wuhan virology institute was experimenting to enhance the coronavirus’s ability to infect humans. Juicing up superviruses is not new. Scientists in the U.S. have long known how to mutate animal viruses to infect humans. For years, Dr. Ralph Baric, a virologist in the U.S. has been collaborating with Dr. Xie Zhengli of the Wuhan virology institute, sharing his discoveries about how to create superviruses. This gain-of-function research has been funded by the NIH. The collaboration between the U.S. and the Wuhan virology institute continues. Drs. Baric and Xie worked together to insert bat virus spike protein into the backbone of the deadly SARS virus. And then used this manmade supervirus to infect human airway cells. Think about that for a moment. The SARS virus had a 15% mortality. We’re fighting a pandemic that has about a 1% mortality. Can you imagine if a SARS virus that’s been juiced up, and had viral proteins added to it to the spike protein, if that were released accidentally?
Dr. Fauci, do you still support funding of the NIH funding of the lab in Wuhan?
Dr. Fauci: Sen. Paul, with all due respect, you are entirely and completely incorrect that the NIH has not ever, and does not now, fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Sen. Rand Paul: Do they fund Dr. Baric?
Dr. Fauci: We do not fund gain-of-function…
Sen. Rand Paul: Do you fund Dr. Baric’s research?
Dr. Fauci: Dr. Baric is not doing gain-of-function research, and if it is, it is according to the guidelines, and it is being conducted in North Carolina and not…
Sen. Rand Paul: You don’t think the bat virus spike protein that he got from the Wuhan lab institute [and inserted] into the SARS virus is gain-of-function?
Dr. Fauci: It is not…
Sen Rand Paul: You would be in the minority because at least three other scientists have signed a statement from the Cambridge Working Group saying that it is gain of function.
Dr. Fauci: Well, it is not. And if you look at the grant, and you look at the progress reports, it is not gain-of-function, despite the fact that people tweet that…
Sen. Rand Paul: So do you still support sending money to the Wuhan virology institute?
Dr, Fauci: We do not now send money to the Wuhan virology…
Sen. Rand Paul: Do you support sending money? We did, under your tutelage; we were sending money, sending it through EcoHealth—it was a sub-agency and sub-grant. Do you support that the money from NIH was going to the Wuhan institute?
Dr. Fauci: Let me explain to you why that was done. The SARS-CoV-1 originated in bats in China. It would have been irresponsible of us if we did not investigate the bat viruses and the serology to see who might have been infected.
Sen. Rand Paul: Or perhaps it would be possible to send it to the Chinese government that we might not be able to trust with this knowledge and with this incredibly dangerous virus. Government scientists like yourself, who favor this gain-of-function research…
Dr. Fauci: I don’t favor gain-of-function research in China. You are saying things that are not correct.
Sen Rand Paul: Government defenders of gain-of-function, such as yourself, say that CoViD-19 mutations were random and not designed by man, but interestingly the technique that Dr. Baric developed forces mutations by serial passage through cell culture so that the mutations appear to be natural. In fact, Dr. Baric named the technique the no-see-it technique because the mutations appear naturally.
Nicholas Baker, of New York Magazine, said, “No one would know if the virus had been fabricated in a laboratory or grown in nature. Government authorities in the U.S., including yourself, unequivocally deny that CoViD-19 could have escaped a lab, but even Dr. Xie in Wuhan wasn’t so sure. According to Nicholas Baker. Dr. Xie wondered, ‘Could this new virus have come from her own laboratory?’ She checked her records frantically and found no matches. “That really took a load off my mind,” she said. “I had not slept for days.”
The director of the gain-of-function research at Wuhan couldn’t sleep because she was terrified that it might be in her lab. Dr. Baric, an advocate of gain-of-function research, admits, “The main problem with the institute of virology is that the outbreak occurred in close proximity. What are the odds?” Baric responded, “Could you rule out a laboratory escape? The answer in this case is probably not.”
Will you in front of this group categorically say that the CoViD-19 could not have occurred through serial passage in a laboratory?
Dr. Fauci: I do not have any accounting of what the Chinese may have done, and I am fully in favor of any further investigation of what went on in China. However, I will repeat again, the NIH and NIAID categorically has not funded gain-of-function research to be conducted in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Sen Rand Paul: You do support it in the U.S. We have eleven labs doing it, and you have allowed it here. We have a committee to do it here. The committee is granted every exemption. You’re fooling with Mother Nature here. You’re allowing superviruses to be created with a 15% mortality. It’s very dangerous, and it’s a huge mistake to share this with China, and it’s a huge mistake to allow this to continue in the United States, And we should be very careful to investigate where this virus came from.
Dr. Fauci: I fully agree that you should investigate where the virus came from, but again, we have not funded gain-of-function research on this virus at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. No matter how many times you say it, it didn’t happen.
Sen. Rand Paul: There was research done with Dr. Xie and Dr. Baric. They have collaborated on gain-of-function research, where they had enhanced the SARS virus to infect human airway cells. And they did it by merging a new spike protein on it. That is gain of function. That is joint research between the Wuhan institute and Dr. Baric. You can’t deny it.
Chair: Sen. Paul, your time has expired. Dr. Fauci, I will let you respond to that. We need to move on.
Dr. Fauci: Excuse me?
Chair: I will allow you to respond to that, and then we’ll move on.
Dr. Fauci: Yeah, I mean I just wanted to say, I don’t know how many times I can say it, Madam Chair, we did not fund gain-of-function research to be conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.xi
There are some concerning statements made by Dr. Fauci in this interview that need to be examined.
In a follow up interview, Fauci offered a more comprehensive explanation:
Dr. Fauci: We had a big scare with SARS-CoViD-1 back in 2002-2003, where that particular virus unquestionably went from a bat to an intermediate host to start an epidemic and a pandemic that resulted in 8,000 cases and close to 800 deaths. It would have been almost a dereliction of our duty if we didn’t study this. And the only way you could study these things is you’ve got to go where the action is. So I often say somewhat tongue in cheek, ‘You don’t want to study bats in Fairfax County, Virginia to find out what the animal-human interface is that might lead to a jumping of species. So we had a modest collaboration with very respectable Chinese scientists, who were world experts on coronavirus. And we did that through a sub-grant from a larger grant to EcoHealth. The sub-grant was about $600,000 over a period of five years. So it was a modest amount. And the purpose of it was to study the animal-human interface to do surveillance, and to determine if these bat viruses were even capable of transmitting infection to humans.xii
During a Senate Appropriations hearing on the NIH budget, Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) questioned Dr. Fauci about NIH funding of gain-of-function research in China and whether China lied about the research being conducted at WIV. If the lies and obfuscations made by Fauci in his senate hearing interrogations by Rand Paul were not enough to raise one’s hackles and cause one to question the narrative, then perhaps Senator Kennedy’s interrogation of the good doctor might elicit more questions in one’s mind.
Senator Kennedy: Madame Chairwoman. Uh Dr. Fauci, I believe you have testified that, uh, that uh, you didn’t give any money to the Wuhan lab to conduct gain-of-function research, is that right?
Dr. Fauci: That is correct.
Senator Kennedy: How do you know they didn’t lie to you?
Dr. Fauci: Excuse me, sir?
Senator Kennedy: How do you know they didn’t lie to you and use the money for gain-of-function research anyway?
Dr. Fauci: Well, we’ve seen the results of the experiments that were done, and that were published and the viruses that they, um, studied are all on public databases now. So, none of that was gain-of-function, and so…
Senator Kennedy: How do you know they didn’t do the research, and uh, not put it on their website?
Dr. Fauci: There’s no way of guaranteeing that, but in our experience with grantees, including Chinese grantees, which we’ve had interactions with for a very long period of time, they’re very competent, trustworthy scientists. I’m not talking about anything else in China. I’m talking about the scientists, that you would expect that they would abide by the conditions of the grant, which they’ve done for the years that we’ve had interactions with them.
Senator Kennedy: So, you don’t think the Chinese would lie to you?
Dr. Fauci: Well, when you say the Chinese, the Chinese are a rather broad group. I know the scientists that we’ve dealt with have been trustworthy.
Senator Kennedy: Um huh. You think all the scientists, uh, have told the truth in terms of the origin of the Wuhan virus and not been influenced by the communist party of China, do you?
Dr. Fauci: I don’t have enough insight into the communist party in China to know the interactions between them and the scientists there.
Senator Kennedy: Right? Why are we giving them money in the first place?
Dr. Fauci: Well, that’s a very good question, and thank you for the opportunity to answer it. Well, SARS-CoV-1 started in China, in Guangdong Province, and it went from a bat to a civic cat to a human.
Senator Kennedy: Yes, and excuse my Doc, for interrupting, but our time is so short.
Dr. Fauci: Yeah, I’m going to be really quick.
Senator Kennedy: Our time is so limited. Why are we giving money to the labs in China to study virology?
Dr. Fauci: Well, I’m going to give you a rather succinct answer to that, sir.
Senator Kennedy: I appreciate that.
Dr. Fauci: And that’s why I was saying the SARS-CoV-1—clearly the bats have the viruses that have the coronaviruses are in China. As I said a couple of times, it’s not in Fairfax County, Virginia, or is it in New York. It’s in China. So, if you want to show and study importantly the animal-human interface…
Senator Kennedy: So, that’s where the bats are?
Dr. Fauci: Yeah, the bats.
Senator Kennedy: I gotya. I want to be sure I understand your testimony. You didn’t give money to the Wuhan lab to do gain-of-function research.
Dr. Fauci: That is correct.
Senator Kennedy: And you believe they didn’t do gain-of-function research because they told you they didn’t.
Dr. Fauci: We’ve seen the results of the studies that they conducted and they were not…
Senator Kennedy: Including any private studies?
Dr. Fauci: Excuse me, including…?
Senator Kennedy: Any private studies.
Dr. Fauci: I’m not sure what you’re getting at, sir.
Senator Kennedy: Here’s what I’m getting at. You gave the money, and you said, ‘Don’t do gain-of-function research.
Dr. Fauci: Correct.
Senator Kennedy: And they said, ‘We won’t.’
Dr. Fauci: Correct.
Senator Kennedy: And you have no way of knowing whether they did or not except that you trust them. Is that right?
Dr. Fauci: Well, we generally trust the grantee to do what they say. And you look at the results…
Senator Kennedy: Have you ever had a grantee lie to you?
Dr. Fauci: I cannot guarantee that a grantee has not lied to us because you never know.
Senator Kennedy: Yeah. Can we agree if you took President Xi Jinping and turned him upside down and shook him, the World Health Organization would fall out of his pocket?
Dr. Fauci: (Chuckles) I don’t think I can answer that question, sir. I’m sorry.
Senator Kennedy: Well, do you think that President Xi Jinping has undue influence over the World Health Organization, do you?
Dr. Fauci: I have no way of knowing the influence of the Chinese President over the WHO.
Senator Kennedy: Okay, so you think that the WHO is a completely independent body, and level playing field, call it like you see it. And they really want to get to the bottom of the origin of the virus. Do you believe that?
Dr. Fauci: My interaction with the WHO and Dr. Tedros, the director-general, has been one, that I do believe he’s a person of a high degree of integrity.
Senator Kennedy: I got it. I wanna, I wanna ask one last question. Why did you guys spike—not guys—and ladies, why did you all spike the prior administration’s investigation into the origins of the coronavirus and whether it could have, uh, could have come out of the Wuhan lab?
Dr. Fauci: Sir, I, we did not spike anything in the prior administration. I’m not sure what you mean by spike. We have no influence…
Senator Kennedy: The State Department spiked the prior administration’s, uh, study.
Dr. Fauci: But that has nothing to do with the National Institutes of Health.
Senator Kennedy: They didn’t consult with ya’ll?
Dr. Fauci: They did not.
Senator Kennedy: Did they consult with you, Dr. Collins?
Dr. Francis S. Collins: I read about it in the press this morning.
Senator Kennedy: Doc, they just spiked it without talking to their experts?
Dr. Collins displays dumb obstinance.
Senator Kennedy: You don’t want to answer that one, do you?
Dr. Collins: (Laughs) I just read about it…
Senator Kennedy: Thank you, Madame Chair.xiii
Senator Johnson: Don’t exactly have a score on the grant programs would be contemplating here, but whatever the costs would be my memo would just simply fund those from the unobligated funds of the American rescue plan. It’s pretty simple, a pretty simple amendment. But while I have the floor here, I do want to speak to another issue that I think is important to this committee. Um, this committee is the Senate Oversight Committee. Now, when I was chair for six years, I know there was some support for investigations, some of my oversight, sometimes there wasn’t. But, when we have hearings on nominees, we ask them a question: whether or not they will comply with legitimate senate oversight requests. And they always say, Yes, and that’s also true of the health committee. Uh, five senators, uh, from this committee, uh, sent letters to the NIH and CDC, and then sent away to the CDC and HHS. And we invoked 5UFC2954, which states, “That executive AMC on request of the Committee of Homeland Security, where any five members thereof shall submit any information of or relating to any matter within the jurisdiction of this committee. Now again, this committee has broad oversight jurisdiction. Um, we have not gotten those oversight letters responded to, not effectively, not in a complete format. Um, Mr. Chairman, I sent you a letter, also signed by five senators, requesting you utilize this committee’s power to compel the agencies to follow the law. They shall supply the information. Now, I just want to use one example, um, a letter we sent to HHS secretary Becerra requesting the unredacted emails from Anthony Fauci that were provided under a forwarding request to a number of different outside groups. We requested those same emails unredacted. By the way, congressional oversight is not subject to the redactions is not subject to the redactions under FOIA. We should have received those unredacted. Um, proof of the fact that the redactions are not valid, I just have copies of one of the emails. This is an email from Peter Daszak dated April 18, and it’s just thanking Anthony Fauci for basically covering for EcoHealth Alliance. You can see from what was produced to the committee, and in the FOIA request, we have a big redaction here.
Image is Available in PDF Format
Fauci email received from EcoAlliance head, Peter Daszac.
And it was redacted supposedly because it was related to an open law enforcement investigation. We basically got the same 4,000 pages, the five senators, uh, except that on this one email, they failed to redact it, so now we know what’s under the redaction. Let me just read you, what was supposedly related to an open investigation. It says, “It has been a very hard few months, as these conspiracy theorists have gradually become politicized and hardened in their stance, especially because the work we’ve been doing in collaboration with Chinese virologists have given us incredible into the risks that these viruses represent, so we can directly help protect our nation from bat origin coronaviruses. We’re fighting to keep our communications open with our Chinese colleagues so that we can better address future pandemics like CoViD-19.”
I have no idea why that would be redacted in an oversight response to congress. I have no idea how that paragraph could be related to an open law enforcement investigation. So, I won’t describe this any further other than to again make the point: This law that we are invoking that requires…that tells these agencies they shall turn over this information—this is a one-hundred- year law—it’s been modified two times, most recently in 1994 signed by Bill Clinton. The supreme court has affirmed congress’s need to have information to write effective legislation. For too many years—and again I was the brunt of it for six years as the chairman of this committee—government agencies, regardless of the administration have thumbed their nose at congressional oversight. They just simply refuse to comply. So, we end up being completely ineffective in an incredibly important constitutional duty and responsibility of congress. Now again, there is no reason—they have the emails. All they have to do is provide them to the five centers that have requested them in an unredacted fashion. By the way our other oversight request is to CDC regarding any contact between the teachers’ unions and the CDC regarding their reopening of school guidance. Was that based on science or was that based on political pressure? I think the public has a right to know. So again, is the senate committee and oversight? If we sit back and do nothing, administrations in the future, regardless of whether they’re Republican or Democrat—whether Democrats are in the majority in the senate or Republicans are—administrations will continue to ignore our oversight requests, and we will not be able to fulfill our constitutional duty and responsibility to our constituents. So, I would hope that every member of this committee will join those five senators that joined me, and use this committee’s power to subpoena those records to say in a very strong unanimous voice congress will not be ignored. Our oversight responsibilities are important, and we demand, we insist that the administration provides us this information…xiv
Everything about the investigation of Fauci shows that he is a duplicitous liar, who seeks every sneaky avenue available to undertake his mad science. He is an unscrupulous psychopath with no moral compunction, who seems to derive pleasure from undertaking research that is as depraved, nefarious, and unethical as possible. For instance, a FOIA disclosure recently found that Fauci used U.S. taxpayer money to conduct inhumane experiments on dogs. Documents obtained by the White Coat Waste Project showed that the NIAID, an agency Fauci oversees, spent $424,000 to infest healthy beagles with flies that carried dangerous parasites.
Fauci’s experiments reportedly resulted in several dogs being infected by the parasites, with multiple dogs being bitten to death by flies. NIAID claimed those experiments were carried out to test the effectiveness of anti-parasitic drugs, despite ethical concerns. The few dogs that survived Fauci’s tests were later euthanized and disposed of. If Fauci is able to do this to an animal much beloved by fellow Americans, an animal long regarded as “man’s best friend,” what would stop him from flouting every ethical rule on the books to conduct experiments in germ warfare that could have implications for human populations.
“The NIH website says they choose beagles because they’re small and docile, means they are easy to abuse,” explained Justin Goodman of White Coat Waste Project. “They took these 28 healthy beagles, infected them with parasites by, as they’ve done in the past, strapping devices that allow them to eat them alive basically, give them parasites and then they killed the dogs at the end of the study.”xv
White Coat Waste Project shocked the world when it first exposed how Fauci’s division at NIH shipped tax dollars to the WIV to conduct experiments, including extremely painful animal experiments. Fauci’s 2021 budget came to $6 billion in taxpayer funding and roughly half of that sum was wasted on animal experiments.
Image is Available in PDF Format
abused in experiments in an NIH lab run by Anthony Fauci. Photo
obtained by WCW via FOIA.
According to recently obtained documents, Fauci’s NIAID spent $424,000 to commission a study in which healthy beagles are given an experimental drug, and then intentionally infested with flies that carry a disease-causing parasite that affects humans. Why would such experimentation be conducted unless the mad scientist in charge of the team wanted to develop disease-causing parasites that affect humans? Claims that it is not gain-of-function research do not wash. Fauci is a criminal who is deliberately trying to conduct research, which has been banned in the U.S., in China. Worse than that is the fact that such research knowhow is being shared with scientists working with an enemy power. People are afraid of saying this because of the ludicrous and hypocritical ‘Woke’ movement and PC culture in the Western society, but the truth has to be stated. China cannot be trusted with this technology and if anyone thinks it can, that person is a fool and should be called out for being so.
Image is Available in PDF Format
Records show that the dogs were “vocalizing in pain” during the experiments. In other words, the poor animals were whimpering and whining in agony, which for humans would equate to screaming in pain. This is nothing short of a death camp for animals.
Image is Available in PDF Format
At the end of the long drawn-out and torturous experiments, the dogs will all be killed. Experimenters involved in the tests have admitted that the drug being tested, “has been extensively tested and confirmed…in different animal models such as mice…Mongolian gerbils…and rhesus macaques….” There’s literally no excuse for Fauci to waste more than $400,000 of your tax dollars on abusing these canines in these unnecessary lab experiments.
Image is Available in PDF Format
Building 567 was where Frank Rosetti and Judy Makovits conducted lab work. Bio-Safety Level 3 lab was on the corner of the third floor. The large ball structure known as the “eight-ball” partially visible behind the building is where they gassed animals with chemical and biological agents. Behind the eight-ball was the building where they tested anthrax, according to Judy.xvi
These aren’t the only depraved experiments on dogs Fauci was responsible for funding. In 2016, WCW exposed how his NIH division was using tax dollars to buy beagle puppies and strapping capsules full of infected flies to their bare skin.
Image is Available in PDF Format
The eight-ball where they once gassed animals with chemical and biological agents is now listed as a historic landmark and cannot be torn down.xvii
Below is an actual photo from the lab where the animal experimentation was taking place.xviii
Image is Available in PDF Format
Beagles strapped with capsules filled with infected fleas in experiments in an NIH lab run by Fauci. Photo obtained by WCW via FOIA.
Denials by Fauci that the NIH’s sub-grant agency EcoHealth Alliance was not funding gain-of-function research is an obvious lie. Why the need for the sub-grant agency to send the money to WIV if there is nothing to hide? Clearly, there was a need to hide something, if the NIH in its wisdom, selected a sub-grant agency with the intention of sending the money directly rather than indirectly to make it more difficult to ascertain the true source of the funding. In addition, we have the article co-authored by batlady Xie Zhengli and Ralph Baric et al., outlining the gain-of-function research they were conducting at WIV. Just look at the abstract of the paper which outlines the nature of their gain-of-function research so clearly:
The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV underscores the threat of cross-species transmission events leading to outbreaks in humans. Here we examine the disease potential of a SARS-like virus, SHC014-CoV, which is currently circulating in Chinese horseshoe bat populations1. Using the SARS-CoV reverse genetics system2, we generated and characterized a chimeric virus expressing the spike of bat coronavirus SHC014 in a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV backbone. The results indicate that group 2b viruses encoding the SHC014 spike in a wild-type backbone can efficiently use multiple orthologs of the SARS receptor human angiotensin converting enzyme II (ACE2), replicate efficiently in primary human airway cells and achieve in vitro titers equivalent to epidemic strains of SARS-CoV. Additionally, in vivo experiments demonstrate replication of the chimeric virus in mouse lung with notable pathogenesis. Evaluation of available SARS-based immune-therapeutic and prophylactic modalities revealed poor efficacy; both monoclonal antibody and vaccine approaches failed to neutralize and protect from infection with CoVs using the novel spike protein. On the basis of these findings, we synthetically re-derived an infectious full-length SHC014 recombinant virus and demonstrate robust viral replication both in vitro and in vivo. Our work suggests a potential risk of SARS-CoV re-emergence from viruses currently circulating in bat populations.xix
The gain-of-function research is undeniable. As the authors of the paper make explicitly clear, they created a chimera virus, in a laboratory setting, by inserting a spike protein zoonotic CoV spike protein from the RsSHC014-CoV sequence, isolated from Chinese horseshoe bats, onto the SARS-CoV mouse-adapted backbone, for the purpose of evaluating the potential of bat coronaviruses to infect humans. This is how the authors of the study put it in their own words:
Although public health measures were able to stop the SARS-CoV outbreak, recent metagenomics studies have identified sequences of closely related SARS-like viruses circulating in Chinese bat populations that may pose a future threat. However, sequence data alone provides minimal insights to identify and prepare for future prepandemic viruses. Therefore, to examine the emergence potential (that is, the potential to infect humans) of circulating bat CoVs, we built a chimeric virus encoding a novel, zoonotic CoV spike protein—from the RsSHC014-CoV sequence that was isolated from Chinese horseshoe bats—in the context of the SARS-CoV mouse-adapted backbone.xx
Gain-of-function of function research can no longer be denied. Fauci is a bold-faced liar. Gain-of-function applications of bat coronaviruses was being conducted at WIV. Sen. Rand Paul was exactly right that Dr. Xie Zhengli and Ralph Baric collaborated with their team on creating a chimeric virus that exactly matches the SARS-CoV-2 virus affecting the human population. The fact that Fauci’s NIH funded this research indirectly through a sub-grant agency proves that efforts were being made to hide the source of funding, which means that those involved knew that what they were funding was nefarious and in breach of international law. This makes all those involved, criminals, including and especially, Fauci. The title “doctor” will be dispensed with as much as possible in reference to this man as well as Xie, as the word “doctor” comes from the Latin and means “teacher”. What are they teaching us? How to violate every code of human decency and ethics, break most of the Ten Commandments, violate international law, commit genocide and crimes against humanity on an unfathomable scale worldwide? Thanks, but if it’s all the same to you, Fauci and Xie, we’d rather not fall under your tutelage and be taught anything by you.
Looking at what the authors of the study say next makes explicit the fact that, not only did this study involve a Frankenstein-like experiment to create a viral chimera in a lab, but clearly alludes to experimentation to discern its pathogenicity:
The hybrid virus allowed us to evaluate the ability of the novel spike protein to cause disease independently of other necessary adaptive mutations in its natural backbone. Using this approach, we characterized CoV infection mediated by the SHC014 spike protein in primary human airway cells and in vivo, and tested the efficacy of available immune therapeutics against SHC014-CoV. Together, the strategy translates metagenomics data to help predict and prepare for future emergent viruses.xxi
Just to be clear in vivo gene therapy means that therapy is administered directly to the patient. The targeted cells remain in the body of the patient. With ex vivo gene/cell therapy, the targeted cells are removed from the patient and gene therapy is administered to the cells in vitro before they are returned to the patient’s body. This would suggest that patients were being experimented upon directly as part of the study, and that they were being infected with a virus with like or identical properties to SARS-CoV-2—whether with or without their knowledge and consent is not known—for the purpose of studying the path and nature of infection, and to experiment with existing medical therapies to ascertain the effectiveness of what the study authors call “available immune therapeutics.”
Certainly, experiments were conducted on mice to see how they reacted to exposure to the dangerous pathogen:
To evaluate the role of the SHC014 spike in mediating infection in vivo, we infected 10-week-old mice with plaque-forming properties of either SARS-MA15 or SHC014-MA15. Animals infected with SARS-MA15 experienced rapid weight loss and lethality; in contrast, SHC014-MA15 infection produced substantial weight loss (10%) but no lethality in mice. Examination of viral replication revealed nearly equivalent viral titers—the lowest concentration of a virus that still infects cells—from the lungs of mice infected with SARS-MA15 or SHC014-MA15. Whereas lungs from the SARS-MA15–infected mice showed substantial staining in both the terminal bronchioles and the lung parenchyma, those of SHC014-MA15–infected mice showed reduced airway antigen staining; in contrast, no deficit in antigen staining was observed in the parenchyma or in the overall histology scoring, suggesting differential infection of lung tissue for SHC014-MA15. We next analyzed infection in more susceptible, aged (12-month-old) animals. SARS-MA15–infected animals rapidly lost weight and succumbed to infection. SHC014-MA15 infection induced robust and sustained weight loss, but had minimal lethality. Together, the data indicate that viruses with the SHC014 spike are capable of inducing weight loss in mice in the context of a virulent CoV backbone.xxii This experimentation on juvenile and geriatric mice must have been done with a purpose. When the UN and affiliated world government bodies are constantly emphasizing the fact that the global population is too high and must be reduced, and that we have exceeded the planet’s carrying capacity, it is self-evidence that seniors, the superannuated, the elderly, whatever you wish to call them, are unwanted. Therefore, the effect of the virus on geriatric mice must have been done for the described purpose of testing lethality rates for certain strains of the virus on older mice to study how it might affect a similar population of humans.
The scientists noted that some of the SARS-CoV strains were unable to bind to the human ACE2, the receptor for SARS-CoV. The authors further claim that the SHC014 spike protein was unable to bind human ACE2, but noted that similar changes in related SARS-CoV strains did allow for ACE2 binding, “suggesting that additional functional testing was required for verification.” They then admit synthesizing the SHC014 spike with “the replication-competent, mouse-adapted SARS-CoV backbone” in order “to maximize the opportunity for pathogenesis and vaccine studies in mice.”xxiii
This is exactly what gain-of-function research consists of in a nutshell, so there is no chance of denying it took place or that WIV was not conducting gain-of-function research. Claims by Fauci that the funding was not for that purpose is simply a lie. No amount of obfuscation or denials by slippery characters like Fauci can obsolve them of their complicity in this criminal operation. Fauci cannot wash the blood from his hands no matter how many times he shouts, “Out damn spot!” There is no longer any sense in denying gain-of-function research was being conducted at WIV.
Another objection and reply to objection that should be made in the course of defending this dissertation is that any allegation of xenophobic conspiracy theory being made against this information can be discounted by simply examining the list of authors involved in this study that had to be privy to whatever lab testing was being conducted at WIV: Vineet D. Menachery, Boyd L Yount Jr., Kari Debbink, Sudhakar Agnihothram, Lisa E. Gralinski, Jessica A. Plante, Rachel L. Graham, Trevor Scobey, Xing-Yi Ge, Eric F. Donaldson, Scott H. Randell, Antonio Lanzavecchia, Wayne A. Marasco, Zhengli-Li Shi & Ralph S. Baric. With the exception of Xing-Yi Ge and Zhengli-Li Shi all the other scientists involved in the study are from the West, probably sent directly from lab facilities owned and operated by the NIH.
In fact, despite his Indian name and background, Vineet D Menachery did his Ph.D. at Washington University in Saint Louis. He is currently working in the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at the University of Texas Medical Branch. His current research is focused on: “Utilizing severe coronavirus infections, the Menachery Lab seeks to define virus-host interactions that dictate disease outcomes taking advantage of three cutting edge platforms: 1) reverse genetic systems for virus generation, 2) a refined systems biology approach, and 3) diverse model systems for infection.”xxiv The University of Texas is also home to Professor Eric Plianka, the “ecologist” who told a meeting of the Texas Academy of Science that a human population reduction was necessary in order to save the planet.xxv
Amazingly, it turns out that Vaneet D. Manachery and Sudhakar Agnihothram have the same picture posted in association with their identities when doing a profile search on Google:
Image is Available in PDF Format
In fact, Sudhakar Agnihothram has no picture posted of himself on Facebook and on other profiles. Why is that? And why would the same picture be posted for both men on Google? What is the cause of this mix up? Is Sudhakar Agnihothram an alter identity of Vaneet D. Menachery? Is Vaneet D. Manachery a government agent employing two identities? Looking at the various research studies undertaken by Sudhakar Agnihothram and Vaneet D. Menachary, it seems they are undertaking exactly the same kind of research. It is remarkable to note how they both just happen to have their fingers on the pulse of all the latest respiratory diseases that have affected the world since the beginning of the millennium:
As for the vaccines, it is clear that tests were being conducted on older and younger mice to see how they would react to SARS-CoV vaccine. What was observed is the fact that the vaccine failed “to protect aged animals in which augmented immune pathology was also observed.” What that means is that, far from protecting older mice from the virus, the vaccine actually caused an autoimmune pathological response, in which the vaccine caused the immune system to turn against the animal like a dog upon its master. In addition, DIV vaccination against infection by strain SHC014 could “possibly augment disease in the aged vaccinated group.” What this means is the vaccine was prone to creating variants of the virus that would be refractory to the test subject’s own immune response. In other words, the vaccine had a tendency to spur mutations and new variants of the disease, especially in older mice. The authors of the study provide an account of the anomaly as follows:
To evaluate the efficacy of existing vaccines against infection with SHC014-MA15, we vaccinated aged mice with double-inactivated whole SARS-CoV (DIV). Previous work showed that DIV could neutralize and protect young mice from challenge with a homologous virus; however, the vaccine failed to protect aged animals in which augmented immune pathology was also observed, indicating the possibility of the animals being harmed because of the vaccination. Here we found that DIV did not provide protection from challenge with SHC014-MA15 with regards to weight loss or viral titer. Consistent with a previous report with another heterologous group 2b CoVs15, serum from DIV-vaccinated, aged mice also failed to neutralize SHC014-MA15. Notably, DIV vaccination resulted in robust immune pathology and eosinophilia. Together, these results confirm that the DIV vaccine would not be protective against infection with SHC014 and could possibly augment disease in the aged vaccinated group.xxvi
There are claims the NIH earmarked $600,000 for WIV over a five-year period ostensibly to study whether bat coronaviruses could be transmitted to humans, as White House chief medical adviser, Fauci, told lawmakers. However, undertaking such studies requires gain-of-function research, despite his denials that the funding of WIV was for that purpose. He can deny it as much as he likes, but it is impossible to study the process of bat viruses jumping the species barrier from bats to humans without undertaking gain-of-function research. The reason for this is that the lab charged with the research has to accelerate the evolution of the virus using gain-of-function techniques to create mutations that allow scientists to see how the virus might be able to transcend the species barrier and make the jump from bats to humans. Fauci is being disingenuous in denying that the lab work being done was gain of function. That is a bold-faced lie and Fauci is a seasoned pro.
Fauci told a House Appropriations subcommittee that the money was funneled to the Chinese lab through the non-profit EcoHealth Alliance to fund what he described as being “a modest collaboration with very respectable Chinese scientists who were world experts on coronavirus.” The Chinese scientists can be as respectable as can be, but a scientist and government agency official of his stature must surely know that the Chinese government cannot be trusted with any kind of bacteriological or virology research that could be employed for dual purpose. Any intelligent U.S. government official has to be aware of the fact that the Chinese government is not our ally and cannot be trusted.
But Fauci emphatically denied that the money went toward so-called “gain of function” research, which he described as “taking a virus that could infect humans and making it either more transmissible and/or pathogenic for humans.”
“That categorically was not done,” he insisted. Well, he’s lying because it was done, because research of that kind requires gain-of-function research in order to model, study, and experiment with the bat coronavirus using CRSPR/Cas9 genetic sequencers in an effort to study the various stages by which a virus can evolve to the point where it acquires the ability to jump the species barrier. This is tantamount to accelerating the virus’s evolution by several generations in a short time ostensibly so as to see what it might be capable of doing in the future. The problem is that once these lab technicians accelerate the virus’s evolution, they have for all intents and purposes created the future, so that if it ever escapes from the lab, either by accident or design, they have created the very nightmare they were ostensibly attempting to forestall.
Earlier in the hearing, NIH Director Dr. Francis Collins told Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.) that researchers at the Wuhan lab “were not approved by NIH for doing “gain of function research” before adding “we are, of course, not aware of other sources of funds or other activities they might have undertaken outside of what our approved grant allowed.” That obfuscation is no excuse because Collins and others should have known better than to assume that scientists working for an enemy government would have the manners and good graces to adhere to the rules outlined in the program mandate.
The NIH cut off funding to EcoHealth Alliance in April of 2020, at the height of the pandemic and over the protests of EcoHealth President Peter Daszak. One can be assured that the NIH also curtailed funding because the institute was making an attempt to contain the fallout from the scandal of undertaking sensitive virology research with a rival superpower. Despite the denials of the U.S. government, the NIH and NIAID, the U.S. government and its agencies could never have naively walked into such a partnership with WIV. They knew exactly what they were doing. It is glaringly obvious that the Chinese were being set up to take the blame for the release of a virus weaponized through gain-of-function research to pose a major threat to the world, medically, economically and politically. The Chinese were set up, to put it bluntly, and they know it.
NIH funding of work at WIV has come under increasing scrutiny in recent weeks, with Republican senators like Rand Paul of Kentucky and Tom Cotton of Arkansas accusing Fauci of lying about whether the money was used for gain-of-function research.
While the theory that the virus accidentally leaked from the lab rather than spreading from bats to humans via another animal, is gaining currency, it is just another red herring. It did not accidentally escape from the lab. It was quite deliberate and everyone knows it. These officials have to discard their politically correct cowardly obfuscations and just say it as it is. They need to have the courage of their convictions and the integrity to say it like it is. They need to be more like former President Trump, who had more forthrightness and courage in his little pinky that these people have in their whole frame.
The Wall Street Journal broke the story recently that three researchers at the lab became so ill in November of 2019 that they sought hospital treatment. Though it is not clear whether the workers contracted coronavirus, their hospitalization coincides with the period when most experts believe the virus was spreading through the city of Wuhan.xxvii
According to a 2017 report in Science News, after surveying bats for five years, WIV had discovered a total of eleven new strains of SARS-related viruses. Within these strains, WIV researchers had found “all the genes” necessary to make a SARS coronavirus “similar to the epidemic strains.” The research team, led by the infamous “Bat Lady” Dr. Shi Zhengli, analyzed the genetic makeup of these newly discovered bat viruses, retracing the “steps that might have given rise to the original SARS virus.”
They found that parts of the DNA appeared to be “particularly prone to rearrangement.” This is what Judy Mikovits meant when she suggested the genetic sequencing was like genetic code. All it takes is a few CRSPR/Cas9 sequencers and the genes can be shuffled like a deck of cards, making the virus more virulent and pathogenic in the process. In addition, several of the strains could “already grow in human cells,” which indicated to these researchers that these bat coronaviruses were already primed to jump the species barrier to humans.
Also quoted in the Science News article is Xie Zhengli’s collaborator on the SARS-CoV-2 gain-of-function research conducted at WIV, Ralph Baric, from the University of North Carolina School of Medicine. Baric notes that the discovery means these bat viruses “are poised to cause future outbreaks,” adding “We can’t let our guard down.”
Dr. David E. Martin has provided a damning indictment of the criminal operations of the NIH/NIAID under Dr. Anthony Fauci’s direction, as criminal fraud and racketeering committed by the CDC, a fully fledged criminal organization.
To offer some background, Dr. Martin’s company—M·CAM—has been monitoring, since around the turn of the millennium, possible violations of the 1925 Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous, or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare (the Geneva Protocol) 1972 Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, and Stockpiling of Bacteriological and Toxin Weapons and Their Destruction (the BTWC). In the 2003-2004 Global Technology Assessment: Vector Weaponization, M·CAM made much of China’s expanding research in the area of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology. It had become obvious that China had joined the club of nations conducting gain-of-function research with the aim of constructing chimeric viruses.
Since that time, M·CAM has monitored the development of research and commercial efforts in this field, including, the research synergies forming between the CDC, the NIAID, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), Harvard University, Emory University, Vanderbilt University, Tsinghua University, University of Pennsylvania, many other research institutions, along with the many commercial affiliations involved in this network.
The NIH’s grant AI23946-08 issued to Dr. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill—officially classified as being affiliated with Dr. Anthony Fauci’s NIAID since at least 2003—began work on the synthetic alteration of the Coronaviridae (the coronavirus family) for the purpose of achieving pathogenic enhancement, detection, and manipulation, which collectively fit the definition of gain-of-function research. And while Fauci will continue to deny this, and claim that critics like Senator Rand Paul don’t know what they are talking about in reference to gain-of-function allegation, the case for Fauci’s NIAID engaging in such research should be obvious by now.
Going all the way back to May 21, 2000, Dr. Baric and UNC sought to patent critical sections of the coronavirus family for their commercial benefit. However, this can be misleading, as it makes it seem like a moneymaking scheme, when there is actually far more to it than that. Let’s face it, the business of manufacturing bioweapons has to, like any other business, be profitable if it is going to survive, and better still, thrive. In one of the several papers derived from work sponsored by this grant, Dr. Baric published what was reported to be the full-length cDNA of SARS CoV, in which it was clearly stated that SARS-CoV-1 constituted a chimeric viral construct or composite of DNA segments.
“Using a panel of contiguous cDNAs that span the entire genome, we have assembled a full-length cDNA of the SARS-CoV Urbani strain, and have rescued molecularly cloned SARS viruses (infectious clone SARS-CoV) that contained the expected marker mutations inserted into the component clones.”
On April 19, 2002—approximately a year before the first SARS outbreak in Asia—Christopher M. Curtis, Boyd Yount, and Ralph Baric filed an application for U.S. Patent 7,279,372 for a method of producing a recombinant coronavirus. For anyone who has ever done any research in this subject area, recombinant technology involves the reconstituting of viruses through genetic splicing of DNA to create chimeric hybrids. In the first public record of the claims, they sought to patent a method for producing, “an infectious, replication defective, coronavirus.” This work was supported by an NIH grant and GM63228. In short, the HHS was involved in funding the amplification of coronaviruses’ pathogenicity between 1999 and 2002, which was before SARS was ever detected in humans.
In the same time frame, M·CAM noted that the CDC was aggressively pursuing some rather unorthodox patent applications. For instance, on April 25, 2003, they sought to patent the SARS coronavirus isolated from humans, which had purportedly managed to transfer to humans during the 2002-2003 SARS outbreak in Asia.
As will be shown later, 35 U.S.C. §101 prohibits the patenting of nature. This bill did not deter CDC from attempting to do just that. Their application, updated in 2007, was finally issued under U.S. Patent 7,220,852. Despite the illicit nature of the patent application, the illegally obtained patent constrained anyone not licensed by their patent from manipulating SARS-CoV, or from developing tests or kits to detect the presence of the SARS coronavirus in humans, or from working with their patented virus for therapeutic use. This means that the patent holder had obtained proprietary ownership not only of the virus, but held the only authorized license to seek its detection, and the only authorized license to develop therapies to ostensibly combat it. In other words, the patent owners had achieved complete mastery over the means and the ends by applying Hegelian dialectics, in order to patent the problem, gain proprietary ownership of the means of detecting it, while, at the same time, gaining proprietary ownership over the therapeutic solution. This led to research experimentation that included recombinant chimeric engineering, gain-of-function studies, viral characterization, detection, and treatment in the form of experimental “vaccines” and other so-called “therapies,” along with efforts to achieve successful weaponization of coronaviruses.
In short, with Baric’s U.S. Patent 6,593,111 (Claims 1 and 5) and CDC’s ‘852 patent (Claim 1), no research of this kind—namely gain-of-function—could be legally conducted in the U.S. without permission or infringement.
M·CAM noted that gain-of-function specialist, Dr. Ralph Baric, was not only the recipient of millions of dollars in U.S. research grants from several federal agencies, but also sat on the WHO’s International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) and the Coronaviridae Study Group (CSG). This conflict of interest is frightening as it shows that the NIH/NIAID and the CDC, and for that matter WHO, are running a national and international protection racket, in which they are pushing so-called “vaccine protection” on the masses, with the mandate that, if health institutions, governments, world health agencies and other bodies do not play along, the health protection rackets will release a bioweapon of even greater pathogenicity and virulence. In addition, unless countries procure and dispense the vaccine, their populations will be threatened with political, economic, and social sabotage.
In this capacity, Baric was not only responsible for determining “novelty” of clades of virus species, but directly benefitted from making false claims about “novel” strains, in order to solicit more research funding, as well as accruing profits from patents and commercial enterprise. Together with CDC, NIAID, WHO, academic institutions, and pharmaceutical companies such as Johnson & Johnson, Sanofi, Moderna, Ridgeback, Gilead, Sherlock Biosciences, etc., there is a powerful group of interests comprising what amounts to “interlocking directorates” in complete violation of U.S. anti-trust laws.
In a quite obscene conflict of interests, these entities also happen to be affiliated with the WHO’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB) whose members were instrumental in organizing the global coronavirus “germ game” exercise EVENT 201 in October 2019. This event, funded by the principal investor in Sherlock Biosciences and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, amounted to a respiratory disease global preparedness exercise to be completed by September 2020. This is precisely what alerted M·CAM to anticipate an “epidemic” scenario unfolding sometime in 2020, actually anticipating the emergence of a plague-causing pathogen from among such candidate locales as Wuhan or Guangdong China, northern Italy, Seattle, New York, or a combination of such population centers. What alerted M·CAM to such a possibility was because Dr. Zhengli Xie and Dr. Baric’s work on zoonotic transmission of coronaviruses identified overlapping coronavirus mutations in bat populations located in these human population centers.xxviii
The Fauci/CoViD-19 Dossier is therefore highly revealing of the numerous criminal violations that may be associated with the CoViD-19 bioterrorism plot. For instance, the dossier shows that the research undertaken by Fauci, Baric, Batlady Xie and company, on behalf of the NIH/NIAID and CDC, are found to be in strict violation of Bill 35 U.S.C. § 101, which disqualifies any patent application being made on that which is “natural,” i.e. neither invented, created, nor manufactured by means of human agency, but found solely in nature.
35 U.S.C. § 101
From Justice Clarence Thomas’ opinion for the majority
Section 101 of the Patent Act provides: “Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful...composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title." 35 U.S.C. § 101.
have “long held that this provision contains an important implicit
exception [:] Laws of nature, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas
are not patentable.” Mayo, 566 U.S., at ___, 132 S.Ct., at 1293.
Rather, “’they are the basic tools of scientific and
technological work’” that lie beyond the domain of patent
protection. Id., at ___, 132 S.Ct., at 1293. As the Court has
explained, without this exception, there would be considerable
danger that the grant of patents would
“tie up” the use of such tools and thereby ”inhibit future innovation premised upon them.” Id., at ___, 132 S.Ct., at 1301. This would be at odds with the very point of patents, which exist to promote creation. Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303, 309, 100 S.Ct. 2204, 65 L.Ed.2d 144 (1980) (Products of nature are not created, and “’manifestations... of nature [are] free to all men and reserved exclusively to none’”).xxix
In their majority opinion in 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court made it abundantly clear that the Court had “long held” that nature was not patentable. Merely isolating DNA does not constitute patentable subject matter. In their patent, the CDC made false and misleading claims to the United States Patent & Trademark Office by stating that, “A newly isolated human coronavirus has been identified as the causative agent of SARS, and is termed SARS-CoV.”4 No “causal” data was provided for this statement.
When they filed their patent application on April 25, 2003, their first claim (and the only one that survived to ultimate issuance over the objection of the patent examiner in 2006 and 2007) was the genome for SARS CoV.
While this patent is clearly illegal under 35 U.S.C. §101, not only did the CDC insist on its granting over non-final and final rejections, but they also continued to pay maintenance fees on the patent after the 2013 Supreme Court decision confirmed that it was illegal.
In addition, the CDC patented the detection of SARS-CoV using a number of methods, including reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). With this patent, they precluded anyone outside of their licensed or conspiring interest from legally engaging in independent verification of their claim that they had isolated a virus, that it was a causative agent for SARS-CoV, or that any therapy could be effective against the reported pathogen.
It is important to note that the CDC’s patent applications were also rejected in non-final and final rejections for ineligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 102 for being publicly disclosed prior to their own filing. In the first non-final rejection, the USPTO stated that the CDC’s genome was published in four Genbank accession entries on April 14, 18, and 21, 2003 with identity ranging from 96.8% to 99.9% identical sequences. Dr. Fauci knew, and failed to disclose evidence that the CDC patent was illegal, based on work he had funded in the years leading up to the SARS outbreak.
After seeking an illegal patent, petitioning to override the decision of an examiner to reject it, and ultimately prevailing with the patent’s grant, the CDC lied to the public by stating they were controlling the patent so that it would be “publicly available”. Unfortunately, this public statement is falsified by the fact that their own publication in Genbank had, in fact, made it public domain and thereby unpatentable. This fact, confirmed by patent examiners, was overridden by CDC in a paid solicitation to override the law.
While not covered under 35 U.S.C. §101, Fauci’s abuse of the patent law is detailed below. Of note, however, is his willful and deceptive use of the term “vaccine” in patents and public pronouncements to pervert the meaning of the term for the manipulation of the public.
In the 1905 Jacobson v. Mass case, the court was clear that a PUBLIC BENEFIT was required for a vaccine to be mandated. Neither Pfizer nor Moderna have proved a disruption of transmission. In Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S.
11 (1905), the court held that the context for their opinion rested on the following principle:
“This court has more than once recognized it as a fundamental principle that 'persons and property are subjected to all kinds of restraints and burdens in order to secure the general comfort, health, and prosperity of the state…”
The Moderna and Pfizer so-called “vaccine” trials have explicitly acknowledged that their gene therapy technology has no effect whatsoever in mitigating viral infection or transmission and merely conveys to the recipient the capacity to produce an S1 spike protein endogenously by the introduction of a synthetic mRNA sequence. Therefore, the basis for the Massachusetts statute and the Supreme Court’s determination is moot with respect to this patent because of the fraudulent nature of the patent itself.
In addition, the USPTO, in its REJECTION of Anthony Fauci’s HIV vaccine made the following statement supporting their rejection of his fraudulent invention:
Image is Available in PDF Format
18 U.S.C. §2339 C et seq. – Funding and Conspiring to Commit Acts of Terror
Indirectly, unlawfully and willfully provides or collects funds with the intention that such funds be used, or with the knowledge that such funds are to be used, in full or in part, in order to carry out—
an act which constitutes an offense within the scope of a treaty specified in subsection (e)(7), as implemented by the United States, or
any other act intended to cause death or serious bodily injury to a civilian, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities in a situation of armed conflict, when the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population, or to compel a government or an international organization to do or to abstain from doing any act….
By April 11, 2005, Fauci was publicly acknowledging the association of SARS with bioterror potential. Leveraging the fear of the anthrax bioterrorism of 2001, he publicly celebrated the economic boon that domestic terror had directed towards his budget. He specifically stated that NIAID was actively funding research on a “SARS Chip” DNA microarray to rapidly detect SARS (something that was not made available during the current “pandemic”) and two candidate vaccines focused on the SARS CoV spike protein. Led by three Chinese researchers under his employment—Zhi-yong Yang, Wing-pui Kong, and Yue Huang—Fauci had at least one DNA vaccine in animal trials by 2004. This team, part of the Vaccine Research Center at NIAID, was primarily focused on HIV vaccine development but was tasked to identify SARS vaccine candidates as well. Working in collaboration with Sanofi, Scripps Institute, Harvard, MIT and NIH, Dr. Fauci’s decision to unilaterally promote vaccines as a primary intervention for several designated “infectious diseases” precluded proven therapies from being applied to the sick and dying.
The CDC and NIAID led by Fauci entered into trade among States (including, but not limited to working with EcoHealth Alliance Inc.) and with foreign nations (specifically, the WIV and the Chinese Academy of Sciences) through the 2014 et seq NIH Grant R01AI110964 to exploit their patent rights. This research was known to involve surface proteins in a coronavirus that had the capacity to directly infect human respiratory systems. In flagrant violation of the NIH moratorium on gain-of-function research, NIAID and Ralph Baric persisted in working with chimeric coronavirus components, with the specific aim of amplifying the pathogenicity of the biologic material.
By October 2013, the WIV 1 coronavirus S1 spike protein was described in NIAID’s funded work in China. This work involved NIAID, USAID, and Peter Daszak, the head of EcoHealth Alliance. This work, funded under R01AI079231, was pivotal to the isolation and manipulation of viral fragments selected from sites across China which contained high risk for severe human response.
By March 2015, both the virulence of the S1 spike protein and the ACE II receptor was known to present a considerable risk to human health. NIAID, EcoHealth Alliance and numerous researchers lamented the fact that the public was not sufficiently concerned about the coronavirus to adequately fund their desired research.xxx
Knowing that the HSS, through CDC, NIH, NIAID, aided and abetted by means of their funded laboratories and commercial partners, the creation of patents on each proposed element of medical countermeasures and their funding, Dr. Fauci, Dr. Gao (China CDC), and Dr. Elias of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, conspiring to commit acts of terror on the global population—including the citizens of the United States—when, in September 2019, they published the following mandate:
“Countries, donors and multilateral institutions must be prepared for the worst. A rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen (whether naturally emergent or accidentally or deliberately released) poses additional preparedness requirements. Donors and multilateral institutions must ensure adequate investment in developing innovative vaccines and therapeutics, surge manufacturing capacity, broad-spectrum antivirals and appropriate nonpharmaceutical interventions. All countries must develop a system for immediately sharing genome sequences of any new pathogen for public health purposes along with the means to share limited medical countermeasures across countries.xxxi
As if to confirm the utility of the September 2019 demand for “financing and development of” vaccine and the fortuitous SARS CoV-2 alleged outbreak in December of 2019, Anthony Fauci began gloating that his fortunes for additional funding were likely to change for the better. In a February 2020 interview in STAT, he was quoted as saying:
“The emergence of the new virus is going to change that figure, likely considerably, Fauci said. “I don’t know how much it’s going to be. But I think it’s going to generate more sustained interest in coronaviruses because it’s very clear that coronaviruses can do really interesting things.”xxxii
Let’s rewind the tape and hear those words again: “it’s very clear that coronaviruses can do really interesting things.” Those are the words of a low-empathy psychopath who is coldly reviewing the effect coronaviruses have on those they infect, something he finds intensely fascinating. Can anyone imagine a comment or an attitude more cold-hearted, unfeeling and lacking in empathy than this?
Fauci has resorted to intimidation and coercion of a civilian population and sought to influence the policy of a government, which has served to influence other governments. Reporting to the president that as many as 2.2 million deaths could result from a pathogen that had not yet been isolated, and whose infection rate could not be measured with any accuracy, Fauci intimidated and coerced the government and citizens of the U.S. into adopting reckless, untested, and harmful measures, resulting in criminal endangerment to lives and livelihoods. In fact, neither the Imperial College nor the “independent” Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation—funded principally by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation—had any evidence of having any accurately obtained estimates for establishing the harmfulness of the so-called “novel coronavirus,” as it was initially dubbed, but that did not stop Fauci, without peer review or consultation, from adopting the shocking estimates of these bodies as the basis for pandemic response measures that inveigh against traditional medical wisdom.
In light of this, Fauci is in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2331 §§ 802, defined as Acts of Domestic Terrorism resulting in the death of American Citizens. In brief, its relevance to the criminal actions of Fauci are summed up by section 802 of the bill:
Section 802 of the USA PATRIOT Act (Pub. L. No. 107-52) expanded the definition of terrorism to cover “domestic,” as opposed to international, terrorism. A person engages in domestic terrorism if they do an act “dangerous to human life” that is a violation of the criminal laws of a state or the United States, if the act appears to be intended to: (i) intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion;
While exploiting the power of the NIAID when functioning as its head, Anthony Fauci actively suppressed proven medical therapeutics used successfully in the past against respiratory agents, that offered alternatives to the products funded by the pharmacological entities he acted on behalf of and served, for which he had provided direct funding and for whom he would receive tangible and intangible benefits, which in any judicious case of oversight would be seen as a gross conflict of interest.xxxiii
NIAID’s Director Anthony Fauci is listed as an inventor on 8 U.S. patents. As in the feudal system of old, the pecking order allows for the highest-ranking lord to assume all the credit. Fauci invented nothing. His lab rats are responsible for the technical expertise, and as a Deep State plant, Fauci the bureaucrat takes all the credit. He is a fraud in every conceivable application of the word. To add grist to this claim, none of Fauci’s so-called patents are reported in NIAID, NIH, or GAO reports of active licensing despite the fact that Fauci was purportedly compelled to get paid for his interleukin-2 “invention,” payments for which he claimed it was inappropriate for him to receive payment, and which he instead donated all proceeds to an unnamed charity.xxxiv
None of Fauci’s patents are listed in the FDA’s Orange book itemized in the Government Accountability Office (GAO) report. Furthermore, none of the NIAID patents are listed despite the evidence that Gilead Sciences and Janssen Pharmaceuticals (a division of Johnson & Johnson) directly profited from products derived from NIAID research and development. Profits accrued for both entities are estimated to have been over $2 billion annually from NIAID-funded science. No mention is made in the GAO report of 2 patents for Velclade®, which has been estimated to have generated sales of at least $2.18 billion annually. None of the patents for Yescarta®, Lumoxiti®, nor Kepivance® are listed in the GAO report. This is in strict violation of 37 USC §410.10 and 35 USC §202(a), since over 13 of the 21 patents in the GAO report fail to disclose NIH as the source of funding.xxxv
In light of this, one needs to also consider the fact that lying to the GAO is tantamount to lying to congress, an offence clearly punishable by law under 18 U.S.C. § 1001–Lying to Congress.
18 U.S.C. § 1001–Lying to Congress
Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—
falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.xxxvi
Sample of Shady Flow of Funds to Evade Oversight
It happens that U.S. Patent 8,999,351 was issued to Tekmira Pharmaceuticals Corporation in Burnaby, British Columbia. In the patent application, they disclose that their research was supported by a grant from the NIAID (Grant HHSN266200600012C). Ironically, this $23 million grant was awarded in 2006 to Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., not to Tekmira, so there is a funding shell game taking place to conceal the real grantee and grant source.
In 2012, Alnylam agreed to pay Tekmira $65 million to settle legal disputes, including a $1 billion damages claim for “relentless and egregious” misappropriation of Tekmira’s trade secrets. From the patent filing’s earliest priority of November 10, 2008, there is no public record stating that Tekmira was the beneficiary of this NIAID grant. Nevertheless, it turns out that the lipid nanoparticle technology developed from this grant is the very same technology now being used in Moderna’s CoViD-19 gene therapy experiment referred to as an mRNA “vaccine”. In their 10-Q filing, Alnylam reported acquiring a license to technology it had received from Arbutus—formerly Tekmira—which has accused Acuitas of misappropriating trade secrets and licensing them to Moderna and Pfizer, both of which have entered into collaboration with BioNTech.xxxvii
If that isn’t enough, it turns out that, through the issuance of non-competitive grant awards to UNC Chapel Hill’s Ralph Baric, to selection of the Bio-Safety Level 4 laboratory locations, to the setting of prices for Remdesivir and mRNA therapies from Moderna and Pfizer, NIAID, CDC, and the HHS have conspired to illegally allocate Federal funds to co-conspiring parties without proper oversight or independent review.
Around March 12, 2020, in an effort to enrich their financial interests by way of securing additional funding from federal agencies and so-called charitable foundations, the CDC and NIAID, under the direction of Anthony Fauci, elected to suspend testing and classify CoViD-19 by capricious symptom presentation alone. Forcing the public to rely on The CoViD Tracking Project—funded by the Bloomberg, Zuckerberg and Gates Foundation—Fauci used fraudulent testing technology (RT-PCR) to conflate “CoViD cases” with positive PCR tests in the living, while calling for CoViD-19 deaths to be counted on the basis of symptoms alone. This perpetuated a market demand for the CoViD-19 vaccines, which virus creator, Fauci, held proprietary ownership over through the federal agencies, NIH/NIAID, he headed.xxxviii
Fauci just happens to be on the Leadership Council of the Bill & Malinda Gates Global Vaccine Action Plan. While controlling the economic dispensation of Federal research funding, Fauci has been, and continues to be, on WHO’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board. No one should have that much power and influence. He is joined on this board by the conflicted donor from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Dr. Chris Elias and the State Council of China’s Dr. George F. Gao of the Chinese CDC. This GPMB stipulated that all member states must take part in a global simulation of the release of a respiratory pathogen, which we all now know was Event 201, which is a disguised reference to 21, as in 2021, just in time to meet the sustainable development goals (SDGs) of UN Agenda 21.
It appears that, during the period of patent enforcement and after the Supreme Court ruling confirming that patents on genetic material were illegal, the CDC and NIAID led by Anthony Fauci entered into trade among States, including EcoHealth Alliance Inc., and with foreign nations—in particular WIV and the Chinese Academy of Sciences—through the 2014 et seq NIH Grant R01AI110964 to exploit their patent rights.
It also appears that, during the period of patent enforcement, and after the Supreme Court ruling confirming that patents on genetic material were illegal, the CDC and NIAID entered into trade among States and with foreign nations (specifically, WIV and the Chinese Academy of Sciences represented by Zheng-Li Xie) through U19AI109761 (Ralph S. Baric), U19AI107810 (Ralph S. Baric), and National Natural Science Foundation of China Award 81290341 (Zheng-Li Xie) et al., 2015-2016.
It further appears that, during the period of patent enforcement, and with the exact same Supreme Court ruling in place, the CDC and NIAID entered into trade among States and with foreign nations to conduct chimeric construction of novel coronavirus material with intended viral vectors, prior to, during, and following the ruling made by the NIH in October 17, 2014 that this work did not sufficiently meet its biosecurity and safety standards.
In this inquiry, it is presumed that the CDC and its associates were: a) fully aware of the work being performed using their patented technology; b) entered into explicit or implicit agreements including licensing, or other consideration; and, c) willfully engaged one or more foreign interests to carry forward the exploitation of their proprietary technology, when the U.S. Supreme Court had established that such patents were illegal and after the NIH had issued a moratorium on such research.
Reportedly, in January 2018, the U.S. Embassy in China sent investigators to WIV and found that, “During interactions with scientists at the WIV laboratory, they noted the new lab has a serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate this high-containment laboratory.” The Washington Post reported that this information was contained in a cable dated January 19, 2018. Over a year later, in June 2019, the CDC conducted an inspection of Fort Detrick’s USAMRIID and ordered it closed after alleging that their inspection found biosafety hazards. A report in the journal Nature in 2003 (423(6936): 103) reported cooperation between CDC and USAMRIID on coronavirus research followed by considerable subsequent collaboration. The CDC, for what appear to be the same type of concern identified in Wuhan, elected to continue work with the Chinese government while closing the U.S. Army facility.
The CDC reported the first case of a SARS-CoV-like illness in the U.S. in January 2020 with the CDC’s Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) reporting 650 clinical cases and 210 tests. Given that the suspected pathogen was first identified in official reports on December 31, 2019, one can only conclude that CDC: a) had the means and ability to conduct tests to confirm the existence of a “novel coronavirus”; or, b) did not have said means and ability and falsely reported the information in January. It strains credulity to suggest that the WHO or the CDC could manufacture and distribute tests for a “novel” pathogen, when the reliability of such tests have been called into question by world-renowned scientists like Michael Yeaden, formerly at the helm of Pfizer.xxxix
M·CAM and Knowledge Ecology International have independently confirmed that Moderna violated U.S. law when it failed to disclose the fact that the U.S. government was the source of funding for their patents and patent applications. This is particularly problematic for U.S. Patent 10,702,600 (‘600) related to, “a messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) comprising an open reading frame encoding a betacoronavirus (BetaCoV) S protein or S protein subunit formulated in a lipid nanoparticle.” The specific claims addressing the pivot to the SARS Coronavirus were patented on March 28, 2019—9 months before the SARS CoV-2 outbreak. This provides significant evidence that this entire orchestration is a plandemic from start to finish.
Both the patent and the DARPA funding for the technology were disclosed in the New England Journal of Medicine, while government funding of the patent was concealed. In 2013, the Autonomous Diagnostics to Enable Prevention and Therapeutics (ADEPT) program awarded grant funding to Moderna Therapeutics ostensibly for developing a new type of so-called ‘vaccine’, consisting of an mRNA vaccine, which is actually a gene therapy and not the inoculant it purports to be. The initial DARPA grant was W911NF-13-1-0417. The company used that technology to develop its CoViD-19 ‘vaccine’, currently undergoing Phase I clinical trials in conjunction with NIH. However, the bona fide nature of the so-called ‘trial’ must also be questioned given the wholesale fraud committed at every stage, beginning with the illegal and fraudulent patenting of ‘nature’ in the form of a patent on a virus.xl
Anthony Fauci has forced upon the healthy population of the U.S. a medical experiment in the form of an unlawful clinical trial justified and mandated through the extrapolation of epidemiologic data by the HSS. No informed consent has been sought or secured for any of the “medical countermeasures” forced upon the population by means of the Emergency Authorization Act provisions. This is in strict violation of the Nuremburg Code, which expressly forbids a medical experiment from being conducted on a civilian population without the informed consent of said population. In addition, no independent review board, as required by the statute, has been convened.
i Natalie Battendorf and Jason Leopold,“Anthony Fauci’s Emails Reveal The Pressure That Fell On One Man,” June 2 2021, https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/nataliebettendorf/fauci-emails-covid-response
ii Silviu “Silview” Costinescu, “FAUCI E-MAILS: A CORONAVIRUS BIOWEAPON PRODUCTION METHOD AND MORE SICK FINDS.” June 2, 2021, https://silview.media/2021/06/02/coronavirus-bioweapon-production-method-from-faucis-e-mails-its-legit/
iii Alexandra Bruce, “The Primary 9/11 Cover-Up Artist Philip Zelikow Is Now the COVID Commission Planning Group Chairman,” May 27, 2021, http://stateofthenation.co/?p=66925
iv Silviu “Silview” Costinescu, “FAUCI E-MAILS: A CORONAVIRUS BIOWEAPON PRODUCTION METHOD AND MORE SICK FINDS.” June 2, 2021, https://silview.media/2021/06/02/coronavirus-bioweapon-production-method-from-faucis-e-mails-its-legit/
v Matt Margolis, “BOMBSHELL: Fauci Pushed for 'Gain-of-Function' Research in 2012, Said It Was Worth the Risk of Pandemic,” June 6, 2021, http://220.127.116.11/2021-06-25-san-francisco-forcing-employees-to-get-vaccines.html
vi Stacey Lennox, “The 2015 Gain-of-Function Study at the Wuhan Institute Had a Glaring Omission That Is Unbelievable,” June 3, 2021, https://pjmedia.com/columns/stacey-lennox/2021/06/03/the-2015-gain-of-function-study-at-the-wuhan-institute-had-a-glaring-omission-that-is-unbelievable-n1451913?utm_source=piano&utm_medium=onsite&utm_campaign=582
vii Natelie Winters, “Stunning Daszak/Fauci Emails Reveal Non-Zoonotic Coronavirus and Attempts To Infect Human Cells,” By Natalie Winters, July 9, 2021, https://thenationalpulse.com/exclusive/daszak-fauci-email-reveal-coronavirus-research-with-wuhan/
viii FauciEmails# quoted in, “Stunning Daszak/Fauci Emails Reveal Non-Zoonotic Coronavirus and Attempts To Infect Human Cells,” By Natalie Winters, July 9, 2021, https://thenationalpulse.com/exclusive/daszak-fauci-email-reveal-coronavirus-research-with-wuhan/
ix Natural News, “Fauci email shows that Daszak was manipulating bat coronaviruses to make them attack human cells,” July 12, 2021,
x FreedomBeacon, “Wuhan Lab Found The Genes To Make COVID In 2017, Evidence Shows,” https://freedombeacon.com/wuhan-lab-found-the-genes-to-make-covid-in-2017-evidence-shows/
xi “Fauci and Rand Paul clash over SUPER VIRUS CONSPIRACY,” May 11, 2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2U1ViAabtd8
xii Fauci interview on C-Span featured in “Fauci admits ‘modest’ NIH funding of Wuhan lab but denies ‘gain of function’” https://nypost.com/2021/05/25/fauci-admits-nih-funding-of-wuhan-lab-denies-gain-of-function/
xiii Senate Appropriations Hearing, “Don’t Think the Chinese Would Lie To You?”: Senator Kennedy Pushes Fauci on Gain-Of-Function Research,” May 26. 2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Rt_dcAh8JI
xiv Forbes Breaking News, “‘No Idea Why That Would Be Redacted’: Johnson Calls For More Transparency In Fauci Communications,” August 4, 2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKyda16KrJ8
xv One America News Network (OANN), “FOIA Disclosure: Fauci Conducted Inhumane Tests On Dogs, NIAID Wasted $424k Of Taxpayer Funds To Infest Healthy Dogs With Parasites,” August 8, 2021, https://www.oann.com/foia-disclosure-fauci-conducted-inhumane-tests-on-dogs-niaid-wasted-424k-of-taxpayer-funds-to-infest-healthy-dogs-with-parasites/
xvi Kent Heckenlively J.D. and Judy Mikovits, Plague of Corruption: Restoring Faith in the Promise of Science, Foreword by Robert Kennedy Jr., New York: Skyhorse Publishing, 2020, pp.137.
xvii Ibid., p.140.
xviii Amanda Nieves, “WCW EXPOSÉ: FAUCI SPENT $424K ON BEAGLE EXPERIMENTS, DOGS BITTEN TO DEATH BY FLIES,” July 30, 2021, https://blog.whitecoatwaste.org/2021/07/30/fauci-funding-wasteful-deadly-dog-tests/
xix Vineet D Menachery, Boyd L Yount Jr, Kari Debbink, Sudhakar Agnihothram, Lisa E Gralinski, Jessica A Plante, Rachel L Graham, Trevor Scobey, Xing-Yi Ge, Eric F Donaldson, Scott H Randell, Antonio Lanzavecchia, Wayne A Marasco, Zhengli-Li Shi & Ralph S Baric, “A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence,” https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985#Ack1
xxiv utmb Health, https://microbiology.utmb.edu/faculty/vineet-d-menachery-phd
xxv Ronald Baley, “To Save the Planet, Kill 90 Percent of People Off, Says UT Ecologist,” April 3, 2006, https://reason.com/2006/04/03/to-save-the-planet-kill-90-per/
xxvii Samuel Chamberlaine, “Fauci admits ‘modest’ NIH funding of Wuhan lab but denies ‘gain of function’” https://nypost.com/2021/05/25/fauci-admits-nih-funding-of-wuhan-lab-denies-gain-of-function/
xxviii Dr. David E. Martin, “The Fauci/CoViD-19 Dossier,” https://f.hubspotusercontent10.net/hubfs/8079569/The%20FauciCOVID-19%20Dossier.pdf, pp.2, 3.
xxix Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U.S. 576 (2013), quoted in “The Fauci/CoViD-19 Dossier,” https://f.hubspotusercontent10.net/hubfs/8079569/The%20FauciCOVID-19%20Dossier.pdf, p.5.
xxx Dr. David E. Martin, “The Fauci/CoViD-19 Dossier,” https://f.hubspotusercontent10.net/hubfs/8079569/The%20FauciCOVID-19%20Dossier.pdf, pp.5-7.
xxxi Ibid., pp.8, 9.
xxxii Ibid., p.9.
xxxiii Ibid., pp.10, 11.
xxxiv https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC545012/, quoted in “The Fauci/CoViD-19 Dossier,” https://f.hubspotusercontent10.net/hubfs/8079569/The%20FauciCOVID-19%20Dossier.pdf, p.13.
xxxv Dr. David E. Martin, “The Fauci/CoViD-19 Dossier,” https://f.hubspotusercontent10.net/hubfs/8079569/The%20FauciCOVID-19%20Dossier.pdf, p.13.
xxxvi 18 U.S.C. § 1001–Lying to Congress, quoted in , “The Fauci/CoViD-19 Dossier,” https://f.hubspotusercontent10.net/hubfs/8079569/The%20FauciCOVID-19%20Dossier.pdf, p.12.
xxxvii Dr. David E. Martin, “The Fauci/CoViD-19 Dossier,” https://f.hubspotusercontent10.net/hubfs/8079569/The%20FauciCOVID-19%20Dossier.pdf, p.14, 15.
xxxviii Ibid., p.20.
xxxix Ibid., pp.21, 22.
xl Ibid., pp.23. 24.