Track your Manuscript
Enter Correct Manuscript Reference Number:
Get Details
Top Editors

Dr. Nanjappaiah H. M.
Assoc. Prof. Dept. of Pharmacology BLDEA’s SSM College of Pharmacy & Research Centre Vijayapur – 586103, Karnataka, India

Dr. Shek Saleem Babu
English Language and Literature, English Language Teaching, and Poetry, IIIT, RGUKT, Nuzvid, Krishna Dt. AP, India

Dinh Tran Ngoc Huy
Bank for Investment and Development of VietNam (BIDV)

Dr. Abd El-Aleem Saad Soliman Desoky
Professor Assistant of Agricultural Zoology, Plant Protection Department Faculty of Agriculture, Sohag University - Egypt

Prof. Dr. Elsayed Ahmed Ahmed Elnashar, Ph.D.
Full-Professor of Textiles &Apparel, Faculty of Specific Education, Kaferelsheikh, University, Egypt
Top Reviewers

Dr. Shabnum Musaddiq
Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Narayana Medical College, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India, 524003

Dr. Biman Kumar Panigrahi
Associate professor, Seemanta Instt. of Pharma. Scs., Jharpokharia, Odisha, 757086, India

Efanga, Udeme Okon
Finance, Accounting and Economics, niversity of Calabar, Nigeria

Aransi Waliyi Olayemi
Department of Adult Education, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
Why Us
Open Access
Peer-reviewed
Rapid publication
Lifetime hosting
Free indexing service
Free promotion service
More citations
Search engine friendly
Go Back       Himalayan Journal of Applied Medical Sciences and Research | Volume:3 Issue:4 | July 22, 2022
38 Downloads128 Views

DOI : 10.47310/Hjamsr.2022.v03i04.023       Download PDF       HTML       XML

Clinico-epidemiological Aspects of Patients Presenting with Fracture Neck of Femur to a Tertiary Care Institute in Himalayan Region


Dr. Rohit Rai Vatsyan1, Dr. Virender Singh2 and Dr. Pankit Shekhar*3

1Dr. Rohit Rai Vatsyan, Medical Officer Specialist at R. H. Una, Himachal Pradesh, India

2Dr. Virender Singh, Medical Officer Specialist at R. H. Reckongpeo, Himachal Pradesh, India

*3Dr. Pankit Shekhar, Medical Officer Specialist at Dr. R. P. G. M. C., Tanda, Himachal Pradesh, India



*Corresponding Author

Dr. Pankit Shekhar


Article History

Received: 20.07.2022

Accepted: 30.07.2022

Published: 10.08.2022


Abstract: Background: Hip fracture is a major public health problem that has a significant financial impact on patients and health care systems. The incidence of hip fracture varies by age and sex; it is more common in older people. Hip fracture in elderly osteoporotic patients most often results from low-energy trauma such as falling down. Since fracture neck of femur prevalence increases exponentially with age, as population age and longevity increases worldwide, these injuries are likely to occur at accelerated rates. This is important because among those who sustain fracture neck of femur and survive, an increasing number continue to experience various degrees of subsequent disability including a high risk for falls and further injury likewise. The incidence of hip fractures is increasing and the annual number worldwide is estimated to rise from 1.7 million in 1990 to 6.3 million by the year 2050. This will be a major challenge to the health care system and society. Thus, the present study was carried out to understand the epidemiology of mortality in fracture neck of femur in the patients presenting to the department of Orthopedics at Dr. R. P. G. M. C., Tanda. Methodology: An open cohort, prospective study, was conducted in patients with fractures neck of femur (age 60 years and above) presenting to the Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. R. P. G. M. C., Kangra at Tanda and undergoing surgical intervention. All cases presenting to the department and fulfilling the criteria were studied for a period of one year starting from the date of start of the study. Results: 57.1% (n=486) of the patients were males while remaining 42.9% (n=36) of the patients were females. Udai Pareek scale showed 35.7% of these patients in class IV while 34.5% patients were in class III. Mean BMI of the patients was 22.33±1.95 Kg/m2 with a range from 18.6 to 26 Kg/m2. Bone density measurement by Singh’s index shows that majority of the patients (32.1%; n=27) were in grade 4 while 22.6% (n=19) patients were in grade 6 and 21.4% (n=18) in grade 5. There were 4 (4.8%) patients in grade 1 and 2. 52.4% (n=44) had fracture of right femur while remaining 47.6% (n=40) patents had fracture of left femur. Conclusion: The fracture neck of femur and hip fracture pose a significant risk of mortality and morbidity on the society and need to be focused.


Keywords: Hip fracture, Fracture neck of Femur, Mortality, Singh’s Index, BMI.


INTRODUCTION

Hip fracture is a major public health problem that has a significant financial impact on patients and health care systems [1,2]. The incidence of hip fracture varies by age and sex; it is more common in older people. Hip fracture in elderly osteoporotic patients most often results from low-energy trauma such as falling down. On the other hand, high-energy trauma is the main mechanism of hip fracture in the young adult population [3-5].


Since fracture neck of femur prevalence increases exponentially with age, as population age and longevity increases worldwide, these injuries are likely to occur at accelerated rates. This is important because among those who sustain fracture neck of femur and survive, an increasing number continue to experience various degrees of subsequent disability including a high risk for falls and further injury likewise. Hip fractures remain a persistent cause of excessive morbidity, reduced life quality and premature mortality among elderly [6].


The incidence of hip fractures is increasing and the annual number worldwide is estimated to rise from 1.7 million in 1990 to 6.3 million by the year 2050 [7]. This will be a major challenge to the health care system and society. Most hip fractures are related to osteoporosis [8]. The cumulated risk for hip fracture is 20% for an 80-year-old woman and almost 50% for a 90-year-old woman [9].


In elderly fracture neck of femur are frequent and typically result from mild to moderate trauma in osteoporotic bones while in young adults these fractures are generally due to high energy trauma, such as road accidents. This is mainly because elderly people are unable to dissipate energy as compared to the young person and diminished ambulatory speed. Their protective responses are also diminished because of slow reaction time, weakness, disorientation and the side effect of medication [10].


Hip fractures in elderly patients are serious injuries that can lead to immobility and permanent dependence, negatively impacting patients’ quality of life and resulting in a financial burden for health systems and societies [11]. Hip fractures can also lead to death. Mortality rates among the elderly following hip fractures range from 14% to 36% within 1 year of the injury. During the first three months after hip fracture, elderly patients have a 5- to 8-fold increased risk of dying. The increased mortality risk persists up to ten years. Because of a predicted increase in life expectancy in western countries over the next decades, hip fractures and their consequences will have an even larger impact on health systems and societies in the future [12].


Fractures of the femoral neck are a devastating injury that extends far beyond the musculoskeletal trauma, with significant long-term consequences for the quality of life of both patients and careers. The fractures are common in the elderly. Patient care is complex, requiring multidisciplinary teams and integrated care pathways. Patients above the age of 90 represent a challenging subgroup as they have a number of concurrent medical co-morbidities, and are susceptible to postoperative complications and poorer outcomes [13].


Fracture neck of femur pose a number of management dilemmas depending on the age, sex, nutritional status, co-morbidities, status of the bones and type of fractures. Advanced age and associated co-morbidities are two decisive factors of mortality secondary to fracture neck of femur.


Poor nutritional status is known to be both a common causative factor of fracture neck of femur and predictor of excess mortality following surgical intervention. Many methods including anthropometry, the mini nutritional assessment, nutrition-related blood parameters and dietary analysis are used for nutritional status assessment in clinics. Serum albumin and total lymphocyte count are two of the most important blood parameters for nutritional status and have been recognized as prognostic factors of fracture neck femur.


Hip fractures in the elderly lead to functional decline and a diminished quality of life. Furthermore, these fractures are associated with an in-hospital mortality rate of 7–14%, reaching 14–36% within 1 year of surgery. Hip fractures are also complicated by a 0–49% need for revision surgery, which is influenced heavily by fracture characteristics and surgical interventions [14].


Factors that influence prognosis of elderly patients after hip fracture are age, gender, co-morbidities, anticoagulation therapy, and general physical health status at the time of injury. Furthermore, timing of surgery is thought to play an important role regarding survival. Although international clinical practice guidelines recommend surgical treatment of acute hip fracture within 24 to 48 hours after admission, these recommendations are still discussed controversially. Some researchers argue that early surgery can lead to an increased risk of peri-operative complications, including pneumonia, deep venous thrombosis, bleeding, pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infections and decubital ulcerations because clinicians do not have enough time to optimise patients’ medical conditions preoperatively [15].


Thus, the present study was carried out to understand the epidemiology of mortality in fracture neck of femur in the patients presenting to the department of Orthopedics at Dr. R. P. G. M. C., Tanda.


METHODOLOGY:

The present study, an open cohort, prospective study, was conducted in patients with fractures neck of femur (age 60 years and above) presenting to the Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. R. P. G. M. C., Kangra at Tanda and undergoing surgical intervention.


All cases presenting to the department and fulfilling the criteria were studied for a period of one year starting from the date of start of the study. In first six months all patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were recruited and followed up for next six months. The last patient was recruited 6 months from the day of start of study.


The study was initiated following approval from Institutional Ethics Committee. The patients were given the right to abstain from participation in the study or to withdraw at any time of the study without reprisal.



  • Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients of age ≥60 yrs with fracture neck of femur undergoing surgical intervention.

  • Those giving consent for inclusion in the study.



Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concomitant trauma involving other systems

  • Associated fracture of the pelvis

  • Bilateral hip fracture

  • Pathological fracture

  • Who do not give consent


  • Evaluation and Classification:

For classification of co-morbidities in the study population, the American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) score was used.


After a detailed history, patients were clinically evaluated at the time of admission and details on socio-demographic data of the patients such as age, sex, socio- economic status were recorded according to the Udai Pareek or Kuppuswamy scale for patients from rural or urban area respectively.


All data regarding pre-existing co-morbidities, type of fracture, degree of osteoporosis and type of surgical procedure, hospital stay and perioperative mortality and condition of patient at the time of admission and discharge were collected using the following indices.


After surgery, patients were discharged on the fourth day if the clinical conditions permitted. The telephone number of the investigator was written on the discharge card. The patients were followed up in Orthopedics OPD on the 15th postoperative day for sutures removal and further on 3rd month and 6th month postoperative day for assessment of outcome using defined indices as annexure number 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8.


The patient or their attendant were also contacted on phone by the investigator regarding the welfare of the patient every 15th day.


At the time of discharge the attendant were requested to inform the well- being of the patient to the investigator on the telephone mentioned on discharge card.


All patients reported as dead during the period of study were evaluated using the verbal autopsy performa (Annexure). The queries enquired by the investigator investigated the attributable factors for mortality such as death, major cardiac or pulmonary complications, deep vein thrombosis, urinary tract complications, blood loss, surgical wound complications etc.



  • Statistical Analysis:

The data were presented as frequency, percentages or mean±SD whereas applicable. Student t-test was used to compare continuous variables between 2 groups. Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. P value <0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed using Epi Info version 3.4.3.


RESULTS:

A total of 84 patients with fracture neck of femur were included in the study over a period of one year.


Majority 57.1% (n=48/84) of the patients were males. Our study observed that majority of the patients (n=49/84; 58.3%) were in age- group 61-70 years followed by 28.6% (n=24/84) patients in 71-80 years and 9.5% (n=8/84 in 81-90 years. Only three patients (3.6%) were aged above 90 years. According to Udai Pareek scale, 35.7% (30/84) of these patients were in class IV while 34.5% (29/84) patients each were in class III. There were 12 (14.3%) and 13 (15.5%) patients in class I and II respectively. Mean±SD BMI of the patients was 22.33± 1.95 Kg/m2 with a minimum BMI of 18.6 and maximum BMI of 26 Kg/m2.


Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics of enrolled patients

Socio-Demographic Characteristics

Frequency

Percentage

Age Group

61-70

49

58.3

71-80

24

28.6

81-90

8

9.5

91-100

3

3.6

Sex

Male

48

57.1

Female

36

42.9

Socio-Economic Status

I

12

14.3

II

13

15.5

III

29

34.5

IV

30

35.7


  • Singh’s Index:

Table 6 & figure 6 gives the bone density measurement as per Singh’s Index. Bone density measurement by Singh’s index showed that 4/84 patients were in grade 1 and grade 2 each. Majority of the patients (32.1%; 27/84) were in grade 4 while 22.6% (19/84) patients were in grade 6. There were 12/84 (14.3%) patients in grade 3 and 18/84 (21.4%) in grade 5.

Bone density measurement by Singh’s index showed that 4/84 patients were in grade 1 and grade 2 each. Majority of the patients (32.1%; 27/84) were in grade 4 while 22.6% (19/84) patients were in grade 6. There were 12/84 (14.3%) patients in grade 3 and 18/84 (21.4%) in grade 5.


Table 2: Bone Density Measurement (Singh’s Index)

Singh’s Index

Number

Percentage

Grade1

4

4.8

Grade 2

4

4.8

Grade 3

12

14.3

Grade 4

27

32.1

Grade 5

18

21.4

Grade 6

19

22.6


  • Co-morbidities:

There were 14 patients with diabetes and out of them 2 were not taking medication regularly. There were 11 patients of both hypertension and diabetes and all were taking their medication regularly.


Table 3: Diabetes and hypertension in enrolled patients


Hypertension Present (Regular treatment)

Hypertension Present (Irregular treatment)

Hypertension Absent

Diabetes Present (Regular treatment)

11

0

0

Diabetes Present (irregular treatment)

0

0

2

Diabetes Absent

0

0

71


  • Other Co-morbidities:

There were 9 (10.7%) patients who were suffering from coronary artery disease followed by 6 (7.1%) patients with thyroid anomaly. 2 (2.4%) patients were having TB and bed sores each and 1 (1.2%) had asthma.


Table 4: Other co-morbidities in enrolled patients

Disease

Frequency

Percentage

Bed Sores

2

2.4

Asthma

1

1.2

TB

2

2.4

Thyroid Anomaly

6

7.1

CAD

9

10.7

47.6% (n=40/84) patents had fracture of left femur while 52.4 % (n=44/84) had fracture of right femur.


Table 9: Distribution of patients on basis of diagnosis

Diagnosis

Number

Percentage

Left Femur Fracture

40

47.6

Right Femur Fracture

44

52.4


DISCUSSION:

In our study, age, sex, economic status, BMI and Singh’s index were comparable in the non-survivors and survived patients. Bone mineral density was significantly associated with mortality with p value of <0.001. The bone mineral density (BMD) starts falling with increasing age especially in postmenopausal women due to loss of protective effect of estrogen on bone mineralization.[16]


Peri-operative mortality in our study was 5.95%. In a cohort study by Ramanathan TS [17] from August 2001 to May 2003, they reported mortality of 10.2% in one year. The increased mortality in their study can be due to the time period of their study which was 17 years back and in present study there are better equipments and medications which decrease the associated factors leading to mortality. Study by Shin HJ et al., [85] in 2013-2015 reported one year mortality of 15.1% in femoral neck fractures which is again higher than that observed by us which can be due to the reason that they enrolled patients of age more than 64 years. Another study by Higashikawa T [18] in 2016-2017 reported one year mortality of 11.6% in patients of age more than 65 years.


A meta-analysis reported that the absolute risk of dying within 12 months was 21% in patients who had surgery after 48 hours and 17% in patients who had surgery within 48 hours resulting in a 20% smaller long-term mortality risk in patients operated on within 48 hours.[19]


Foss and Kehlet studied 300 hip fracture patients. They reported that Thirty-day mortality was 13.3% (40 patients) and the total peri-operative mortality was 15.6% (47 patients). Low postoperative mortality rates in our study could be associated with selective patient intake, exclusion of patients with pathological fractures, exclusion of patients sustaining fracture while in hospital, exclusion of patients receiving conservative fracture treatment, and finally insufficient follow-up especially after early discharge or transfer to secondary rehabilitation units. [20]


Studies reported that an overall mortality rate of 20% to 30% is reported in the majority of the literature in patients that suffer a femoral neck fracture [21,22].


One present study reported a mean survival of 29 months and of the 19% of patients in this study who were deceased on follow-up, there was no difference by gender. Diamond et al., reported that men of advanced age who presented with a femoral neck fracture had a greater rate of mortality than women. Of note, the results of the present study were that 10% of study patients lived less than 2 months after hip fracture and 32% lived less than one year [23].


Fransen et al., reported that femoral neck fractures in men implied a greater risk of death or being institutionalized within 2 years after the fracture [24].


Our results also demonstrated that the risk of death increased by 4 times as age increased, with female preponderance with p value of 0.029. Butler et al., [25] in their review of the literature demonstrated that age, gender, cognitive impairment and functional capacity prior to injury were associated with mortality rate. This was affirmed by Erickson et al., [26] who found that 90% of the deaths in their population occurred in patients greater than 75 years of age.


In our study, age, sex, economic status, BMI and Singh’s index were comparable in the non-survivors and survived patients. Bone mineral density was significantly associated with mortality with p value of <0.001. The bone mineral density (BMD) starts falling with increasing age especially in postmenopausal women due to loss of protective effect of estrogen on bone mineralization.[27]


CONCLUSION:

57.1% (n=486) of the patients were males while remaining 42.9% (n=36) of the patients were females. Udai Pareek scale showed 35.7% of these patients in class IV while 34.5% patients were in class III. Mean BMI of the patients was 22.33±1.95 Kg/m2 with a range from 18.6 to 26 Kg/m2. Bone density measurement by Singh’s index shows that majority of the patients (32.1%; n=27) were in grade 4 while 22.6% (n=19) patients were in grade 6 and 21.4% (n=18) in grade 5. There were 4 (4.8%) patients in grade 1 and 2. 52.4% (n=44) had fracture of right femur while remaining 47.6% (n=40) patents had fracture of left femur.


REFERENCES:

  1. Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, Rosen AB. Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States. Jama. 2009 Oct 14;302(14):1573-9.

  2. Jiang HX, Majumdar SR, Dick DA, Moreau M, Raso J, Otto DD, Johnston DW. Development and initial validation of a risk score for predicting in‐hospital and 1‐year mortality in patients with hip fractures. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2005 Mar;20(3):494-500.

  3. Forsh DA, Ferguson TA. Contemporary management of femoral neck fractures: the young and the old. Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine. 2012 Sep;5(3):214-21.

  4. Verettas DA, Galanis B, Kazakos K, Hatziyiannakis A, Kotsios E. Fractures of the proximal part of the femur in patients under 50 years of age. Injury. 2002 Jan 1;33(1):41-5.

  5. Farooq MA, Orkazai SH, Okusanya O, Devitt AT. Intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck in younger patients. Irish journal of medical science. 2005 Dec;174(4):42-5.

  6. Marks R. Physical activity and hip fracture disability: a review. Journal of aging research. 2011 Apr 26;3:1-7.

  7. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton L3. Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporosis international. 1992 Nov;2(6):285-9.

  8. Cummings SR, Nevitt MC, Browner WS, Stone K, Fox KM, Ensrud KE, Cauley J, Black D, Vogt TM. Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. New England journal of medicine. 1995 Mar 23;332(12):767-73.

  9. Zetterberg C, Elmerson S, Andersson GB. Epidemiology of hip fractures in Göteborg, Sweden, 1940-1983. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 1984 Dec 1(191):43-52.

  10. Babhulkar SS. Management of trochanteric fractures. Indian J Orthop. 2006 Oct 1;40(4):210-18.

  11. Leal J, Gray AM, Prieto-Alhambra D, Arden NK, Cooper C, Javaid MK, Judge A. Impact of hip fracture on hospital care costs: a population-based study. Osteoporosis International. 2016 Feb;27(2):549-58.

  12. Kanis JA, Oden A, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Wahl DA, Cooper C. A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide. Osteoporosis international. 2012 Sep;23(9):2239-56.

  13. Marques A, Lourenço Ó, Da Silva JA. The burden of osteoporotic hip fractures in Portugal: costs, health related quality of life and mortality. Osteoporosis international. 2015 Nov;26(11):2623-30.

  14. Tan LT, Wong SJ, Kwek EB. Inpatient cost for hip fracture patients managed with an orthogeriatric care model in Singapore. Singapore medical journal. 2017 Mar;58(3):139-44.

  15. Lyons AR. Clinical outcomes and treatment of hip fractures. The American journal of medicine. 1997 Aug 18;103(2):S51-64.

  16. Panula J, Pihlajamäki H, Mattila VM, Jaatinen P, Vahlberg T, Aarnio P, Kivelä SL. Mortality and cause of death in hip fracture patients aged 65 or older-a population-based study. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2011 Dec;12(1):1-6.

  17. Lizaur-Utrilla A, Martinez-Mendez D, Collados-Maestre I, Miralles-Muñoz FA, Marco-Gomez L, Lopez-Prats FA. Early surgery within 2 days for hip fracture is not reliable as healthcare quality indicator. Injury. 2016 Jul 1;47(7):1530-5.

  18. Schnell S, Friedman SM, Mendelson DA, Bingham KW, Kates SL. The 1-year mortality of patients treated in a hip fracture program for elders. Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation. 2010 Sep;1(1):6-14.

  19. Zuckerman JD. Hip fracture. New England journal of medicine. 1996 Jun 6;334(23):1519-25.

  20. Morrison RS, Chassin MR, Siu AL. The medical consultant's role in caring for patients with hip fracture. Annals of internal medicine. 1998 Jun 15;128(12_Part_1):1010-20.

  21. Parker M, Johansen A. Hip fracture. Bmj. 2006 Jun 29;333(7557):27-30.

  22. Haleem S, Lutchman L, Mayahi R, Grice JE, Parker MJ. Mortality following hip fracture: trends and geographical variations over the last 40 years. Injury. 2008 Oct 1;39(10):1157-63.

  23. Tolppanen AM, Taipale H, Tanskanen A, Tiihonen J, Hartikainen S. Comparison of predictors of hip fracture and mortality after hip fracture in community-dwellers with and without Alzheimer’s disease–exposure-matched cohort study. BMC geriatrics. 2016 Dec;16(1):1-1.

  24. Haentjens P, Magaziner J, Colón-Emeric CS, Vanderschueren D, Milisen K, Velkeniers B, Boonen S. Meta-analysis: excess mortality after hip fracture among older women and men. Annals of internal medicine. 2010 Mar 16;152(6):380-90.

  25. Robustillo, V.SA, Juchno, P., Marcui, M. & Wronsk. Eurostat Demography Report - Short Analytical Web Note 3/2015. 2015

  26. Xu JQ, Murphy SL, Kochanek KD, Arias E. Mortality in the United States, 2015. NCHS data brief, no 267. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC. National Center for Health Statistics. 2016.

  27. OECD. Health at a Glance 2015: OECD Indicators. 1–220 (2015).

Copyright © 2020 Inlight Publisher (IARCON INTERATIONAL LLP). All Rights Reserved.