Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
1313 Views
242 Downloads
Share this article
Review Article | Volume 3 Issue 2 (July-Dec, 2022) | Pages 1 - 4
Modes of Transmission and Virulence Factors of Staphylococcus Aureus (Review)
 ,
 ,
1
Northern Technical University, College of Health and Medical Techniques, Medical Lab. Techniques Department, Iraq
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Aug. 13, 2022
Revised
Sept. 5, 2022
Accepted
Oct. 14, 2022
Published
Nov. 10, 2022
Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a pathogen which colonizes the epidermis and nasal passages of the anterior slits, the alimentary canal, the genitourinary tract, and the pharynx. There are numerous ailments that this bacterium can cause, from mild infections of the skin to fatal pneumonia and sepsis. Bacteria from S. aureus can pass easily through one genus to another. The transition from humans to animals. S. aureus infections are zoonotic. It can be spread from animal to person by bites, scratches, working with diseased animal body parts or bones, and skin sores developed during contact with sick or carrier animals. The treatment of infections that caused by S. aureus is complicated by resistance of the antibiotic, and there is no effective vaccination. The incredibly high number of toxins as well as other virulence factors produced by S. aureus, as well as their impact on disease, have sparked ongoing and growing interest.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Staphylococcus aureus is a ubiquitous, versatile and highly adaptive pathogen that colonizes the epidermis and mucosa of the pharynx, Alimentary canal, gastrointestinal system, and anterior slits [1]. Staphylococcus aureus is a causative agent that causes a variety of infections in man and animals, with serious consequences for health [2]. Host specialization, loss resistance and virulence genes have important public health implications [3,2]. Staphylococcus aureus is the more causative agent of the Staphylococci and the causative factor of disease for a wide range of diseases ranging from superficial skin abscess, food poisoning, and life-threatening diseases such as bacteremia and necrotic pneumonia in children, acute respiratory infection Endocarditis [4]. The development of numerous putative virulence factors, as well as the existence of resistance genes like mecA gene, VanA gene, Staphylococcal exotoxins, and other elements that promote disease onset, immune evasion, and the development of antibiotic resistance in host tissues, are what contribute to the disease's severity. When S. aureus first appeared in the mid-1940s, it was described as bacteria. S. aureus produces a hydrolyzing enzyme called penicillinase, which makes it resistant to penicillin [5].

 

Since then, numerous strains of S. aureus that are resistant to penicillin have been discovered in cases of bacteremia in England and the United States. Resistance isolates were first solely isolated from individuals and healthcare personnel, giving rise to the name hospital-related penicillin-resistant S. aureus. However, resistant bacteria that did not exhibit risk factors associated with hospital isolates were subsequently isolated from members of the public [6]. Methicillin, a semi-synthetic analogue of penicillin, was introduced into clinics as the preferred drug for treating S. aureus infectious illness, that led to a surge in penicillin resistance from the late 1940s through the early 1960s [7].

 

Methicillin resistance in S. aureus, on the other hand, was discovered within a year of it being presented as that of the preferred strategic therapy for the treatment of S. aureus. The achievement of a genomic archipelago comprising the methicillin-resistant determinant mecA causes MRSA. Methicillin-resistant bacteria have obtained worldwide notoriety as the most widely known cause of man and community-related infections since their discovery during the 1960s in the United Kingdom. As a result, the therapeutic value of several important antibiotics is reduced, and hospitalization time is extended [8].

 

Classification

Staphylococcus aureus is a facultative anaerobe that is non-motile and non-spore forming, gram-positive, and catalase as well as coagulase positive. Staphylococci are categorized as follows: in irregular grape-like clusters or sometimes singly or in pairs, Typical colonies on blood agar plates with 5% blood are yellow to golden yellow and hemolytic [9,10].

 

  • Domain: Bacteria

  • Phylum: Firmicutes

  • Class: Bacilli

  • Order: Bacillales

  • Family: Staphylococcaceae

  • Genus: Staphylococcus

  • Species: S. aureus

 

Methicillin-Resistant S. Aureus

MRSA was first identified in 1961, a year after the introduction of methicillin. MRSA strains have since spread throughout hospitals and around the world. MRSA incidence in large US hospital services increased from 4% in the 1980s to 50% in the late 1990s, based on the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Methicillin-resistant strains record for up to 80% of all Staphylococcus aureus strains in some hospitals. Although MRSA is identified as a significant pathogen in hospitals, MRSA has emerged outside of care settings and spread in the community in recent decades. MRSA strains found in the community have also been linked to healthcare-related infections.

 

MRSA genetic analysis revealed that the mecA gene contains a motile genetic component called the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec). There are currently nine various kinds of SCCmec elements identified (types I-VIII and VT). While all nine mobile cassettes contain the entire mecA gene, they each have a slightly various genetic materials term that can affect expression of genes, virulence, and other properties. Bacteria can be described at the strain level, which identifies variations in DNA between bacteria from the same genus [11,12].

 

The Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) gene is a significant genetic variation that is carried by many isolates of MRSA. More proof is required to support the idea that this gene, which is present in several MRSA strains associated with communities, increases virulence by killing leukocytes and inducing inflammation. The arginine catabolic transportable element is the other significant genetic variation seen in MRSA strains. The USA300 MRSA strain is the only one with this feature. Because ACME contains numerous arc genes that increase bacterial fitness, perhaps leading to strains that are harder to treat and control, it is significant.

 

Epidemiology

MRSA was first thought to be a hospital virus that primarily affected persons who had contact with healthcare institutions or other risk factors like substance addiction [11]. Healthcare-associated MRSA or healthcare-acquired MRSA are other names for this form of MRSA (HA-MRSA). The frequency of HAMRSA is highest in Latin America, South America, Europe, and Asia, where it has spread to multiple strains [8]. It is important to highlight that the incidence of HA-MRSA varies significantly by region, which researchers believe is because eradication programs and eradication efforts have been successful.

 

When MRSA infection was first discovered in healthy individuals lacking access to health care or other risk factors, isolation of MRSA in medical institutions started to shift in the 1990s [11]. New MRSA strains have emerged, according to further investigation. Due to their prevalence in healthy communities, these strains were eventually referred to as community-related or community-acquired MRSA [11]. The genetic make-up, related risk factors, and prevalence of the CA-MRSA and HAMRSA strains differ significantly from one another. The type of SCCmec that is incorporated into the genome accounts for the majority of the genetic variations between HA-MRSA and CA-MRSA. The mecA gene is present on bigger SCCmec types in HA-MRSA strains I, II, or III.

 

The risk factors connected to HA-MRSA or CAMRSA colonization or infection are entirely dissimilar. The major risk factors for acquiring HA-MRSA are exposure to public hospitals and a variety of health difficulties [11]. Also, elderly people are more likely to be admitted to hospitals with HA-MRSA genotypes. Pneumonia, bacteremia, and invasive infections are the most typical HA-MRSA infection kinds [13]. Contrarily, CA-MRSA infection is typically found in healthy individuals who have not recently been exposed to healthcare [14].

 

Additionally, CA-MRSA strains appear to be more aggressive and easily spread, and they largely damage the skin and infections of soft tissue [15]. Military personnel, inmates, children in care settings, and members of the armed forces have all been found to be at higher risk for CA-MRSA [16]. It is crucial to remember that CA-MRSA strains have spread throughout healthcare facilities and are also prevalent in the general population.

 

Transmission and Virulence Factors

Because of its proclivity to colonize a wide range of animals, the S. aureus bacterium can quickly have transmitted from one organisms to another. Humans to animals and back again. Zoonotic transmission of staphylococcal infections occurs. It can be spread from animals to people by bites and scrapes, working with organs or bones from diseased animals, and contact with sick animals or carriers that cause skin sores [17].

 

Due to virulence factors such as hyluronidase, proteases, lipases, nucleases that help in penetration of bacteria; a blood clot that converts fibrinogen to fibrinogen; agglomerating agents fibrinogen-binding proteins; protein A that avoids darkening and phagocytosis; Panton-Valentine leucocidin lead to organs damage; Due to virulence factors such as hyluronidase, protease, lipase, nuclease that help in penetration of bacteria; coagulase enzyme that fibrinogen is converted to fibrin; clumping factors; fibrinogen-binding proteins, protein A that avoids opsonization; PVL is to blame for necrotic changes, enterotoxin; Alpha and beta haemolysins, exfoliative toxin (A, B), toxic shock syndrome toxin-1, and S. aureus exhibit a wide spectrum of illnesses [18,19].

 

S. aureus has the capsule, which is a viscous layer of polysaccharide that inhibits the ingestion process by leukocytes, and 90% of S. aureus isolates possess the capsule, and the wall of Gram-positive bacteria consists of Peplidoglycan and Lipotechoic acid, which have a role in the mechanism of adhesion cells that covalently associate with specialized proteins to induce infection in S. aureus [20]. Also, some S. aureus species possess the so-called toxic shock syndrome toxin, which is a protein molecule encoded by chromosome genes and this toxin leads to the manifestation of the clinical pattern of toxic shock syndrome. Toxins produced by S. aureus have the potential to cause cellular damage (Figure 1). S. aureus toxins play a significant part in the progression and progression of the infection in the DFI patient.


 

 

Figure 1: Infection process and virulence factors of Staphylococcus aureus

 

Treatment of Antibiotic Resistance

The first-line therapy for staphylococcal infections is beta-lactam medication. Alternative medications are available, however they have drawbacks such tissue penetration and decreased effectiveness of vancomycin drug; cost of tigecycline drug, daptomycin, linezolid; and toxicity for rifampin [21]. Because of the selective pressure put on it by antimicrobials, S. aureus has the opportunity to develop drug resistance more quickly, which is a problem that affects the entire world [22]. Resistance is caused by transduction, transformation, and conjugation, which are all chromosome or plasmid-related processes [23].

 

Tolerance to beta-lactam antibiotics is mediated by the blaZ gene in the organism. The mecA gene, which encodes a phosphate-binding protein with potentially enhanced binding capability or a novel PBP, may be responsible for the resistance to methicillin and other -lactam antimicrobial agents. Some S. aureus (BORSA) strains are resistant to the antibiotic boderline oxyacillin. These organisms create super-lactamases and resist oxacillin when mecA or mecC are absent [23].

 

Aminoglycosidal resistance may develop as a result of mutations in the genes that control the ribosome, which may cause architectural alterations in proteins that reduce the antibiotic's ability to bind and enhance the antibiotic's impact. The aacA-aphD gene's resistance to antibiotics may also be brought on by decreased absorption of antibiotic or antibiotic-modifying cations by cellular enzymes like aminoglycoside acetyltransferases catalyzed by a bi-functional protein expressed by the aacA-aphD gene [17]. The tetK and tetL genes found on the plasmid are responsible for tetracycline resistance. Active flux is governed by these genes. The tetO or tetM genes mediate ribosome protection.

 

Antibiotic resistance is a growing concern, and it is caused by the subtherapeutic use of these drugs to enhance growth and prevent sickness, which results in the creation of resistant microbes. Worldwide reports of instances associated with MRSA have been made. Spreading of resistant strains to vulnerable populations is facilitated by population mixing caused by international travel, touch with an infected person, or consumption of contaminated food. Tracking the spread of these antibiotic-resistant isolates is crucial for developing mitigation measures [24,25].

REFERENCE
  1. den Heijer, C.D.J., et al. “Prevalence and Resistance of Commensal Staphylococcus aureus, Including Meticillin-Resistant S. aureus, in Nine European Countries: A Cross-Sectional Study.” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 5, May 2013, pp. 409–415.

  2. Luzzago, C., et al. “Clonal Diversity, Virulence-Associated Genes and Antimicrobial Resistance Profile of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Nasal Cavities and Soft Tissue Infections in Wild Ruminants in Italian Alps.” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 170, no. 1, Jan. 2014, pp. 157–161.

  3. Saleha, A., and Z. Zunita. “Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): An Emerging Veterinary and Zoonotic Pathogen of Public Health Concern and Some Studies in Malaysia.” Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, vol. 9, no. 7, July 2010, pp. 1094–1098.

  4. Shaw, L., et al. “The Role and Regulation of the Extracellular Proteases of Staphylococcus aureus.” Microbiology, vol. 150, no. 1, Jan. 2004, pp. 217–228.

  5. Basset, P., E.J. Feil, G. Zanetti, and D.S. Blanc. “The Evolution and Dynamics of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.” Genetics and Evolution of Infectious Disease, edited by M. Tibayrenc, Elsevier, London, 2011, pp. 669–688.

  6. Chuang, Y.-Y., and Y.-C. Huang. “Molecular Epidemiology of Community-Associated Meticillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Asia.” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 8, August 2013, pp. 698–708.

  7. Jevons, M.P. “‘Celbenin’–Resistant Staphylococci.” British Medical Journal, vol. 124, 1961, pp. 124–125.

  8. Purrello, S.M., et al. “Meticillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Update: New Insights into Bacterial Adaptation and Therapeutic Targets.” Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, vol. 2, no. 2, June 2012, pp. 61–69.

  9. Turnidge, J., et al.Staphylococcus aureus.” Guided Medline Search, Dec. 2008.

  10. Plata, K., A.E. Rosato, and G. Wegrzyn. “Staphylococcus aureus as an Infectious Agent: Overview of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics of Its Pathogenicity.” Acta Biochimica Polonica, vol. 56, no. 4, 2009, pp. 597–602.

  11. David, M.Z., and R.S. Daum. “Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Epidemiology and Clinical Consequences of an Emerging Epidemic.” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 23, 2010, pp. 616–687.

  12. Elhassan, M.M., et al. “Absence of the mecA Gene in Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Different Clinical Specimens in Shendi City, Sudan.” BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/895860.

  13. Nimmo, G.R., et al. “Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus in Australian Teaching Hospitals, 1989–1999.” Microbial Drug Resistance, vol. 9, 2003, pp. 155–160.

  14. Herold, B.C., et al. “Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Children with No Identified Predisposing Risk.” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 279, 1998, pp. 593–598.

  15. DeLeo, F.R., and N. Malachowa. “Mobile Genetic Elements of Staphylococcus aureus.” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 67, 2010, pp. 3057–3071.

  16. Miller, R., et al. “Dynamics of Acquisition and Loss of Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus Strains in the Community: The Effect of Clonal Complex.” Journal of Infection, 2014.

  17. Gulzar, M., and A. Zehra. “Staphylococcus aureus: A Brief Review.” International Journal of Veterinary Science Research, vol. 4, no. 1, 2018, pp. 20–22.

  18. Higgins, J., et al. “Clumping Factor A of Staphylococcus aureus Inhibits Phagocytosis by Human Polymorphonuclear Leucocytes.” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 258, 2006, pp. 290–296.

  19. Raygada, J.L., and D.P. Levine. “Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A Growing Risk in the Hospital and in the Community.” American Health and Drug Benefits, vol. 2, 2009, pp. 87–88.

  20. Reddy, P.N., K. Srirama, and V.R. Dirisala. “An Update on Clinical Burden, Diagnostic Tools, and Therapeutic Options of Staphylococcus aureus.” Infectious Diseases: Research and Treatment, 2017.

  21. Sievert, D.M., et al. “Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the United States, 2002–2006.” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 46, 2008, pp. 668–674.

  22. Diekema, D.J., et al. “Antimicrobial Resistance Trends and Outbreak Frequency in United States Hospitals.” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 38, 2004, pp. 78–85.

  23. Chambers, H.F. “Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococci: Molecular and Biochemical Basis and Clinical Implications.” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 10, 1997, pp. 781–791.

  24. Olsen, J.E., et al. “Diversity and Evolution of blaZ from Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci.” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 57, 2006, pp. 450–460.

  25. Sharma, P., P. Kaur, and A. Aggarwal. “Staphylococcus aureus—The Predominant Pathogen in the Neonatal ICU of a Tertiary Care Hospital in Amritsar, India.” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 7, 2013, pp. 66–69.

     

Advertisement
Recommended Articles
Case Report
Mycosis Fungoides – A Case Report
...
Published: 20/10/2021
Download PDF
Research Article
The Role of Elevated CRP in Assessing the Severity and as a Prognostic Marker in Covid19 Patients
...
Published: 04/07/2021
Download PDF
Research Article
A Critical Analysis of Spinal Block Anesthesia under Ultrasonographic Guided Technique: Is Levobupivacaine Alone Effective or on Adjuvant is Warranted?
Published: 20/09/2021
Download PDF
Research Article
Metabolic Syndrome in Treatment Naïve Chronic Hepatitis-B Patients
Published: 10/06/2021
Download PDF
Chat on WhatsApp
Flowbite Logo
Najmal Complex,
Opposite Farwaniya,
Kuwait.
Email: kuwait@iarcon.org

Editorial Office:
J.L Bhavan, Near Radison Blu Hotel,
Jalukbari, Guwahati-India
Useful Links
Order Hard Copy
Privacy policy
Terms and Conditions
Refund Policy
Others
About Us
Contact Us
Online Payments
Join as Editor
Join as Reviewer
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Follow us
MOST SEARCHED KEYWORDS
scientific journal
 | 
business journal
 | 
medical journals
 | 
Scientific Journals
 | 
Academic Publisher
 | 
Peer-reviewed Journals
 | 
Open Access Journals
 | 
Impact Factor
 | 
Indexing Services
 | 
Journal Citation Reports
 | 
Publication Process
 | 
Impact factor of journals
 | 
Finding reputable journals for publication
 | 
Submitting a manuscript for publication
 | 
Copyright and licensing of published papers
 | 
Writing an abstract for a research paper
 | 
Manuscript formatting guidelines
 | 
Promoting published research
 | 
Publication in high-impact journals
Copyright © iARCON Internaltional LLP . All Rights Reserved.