The fracture of Hip has been a public health problem that has a significant financial impact on patients and health care systems [1-2]. The incidence of hip fracture varies by age and sex; it is more common in older people. Hip fracture in elderly osteoporotic patients most often results from low-energy trauma such as falling down. On the other hand, high-energy trauma is the main mechanism of hip fracture in the young adult population [3-5].

Since fracture neck of femur prevalence increases exponentially with age, as population age and longevity increases worldwide, these injuries are likely to occur at accelerated rates. This is important because among those who sustain fracture neck of femur and survive, an increasing number continue to experience various degrees of subsequent disability including a high risk for falls and further injury likewise. Hip fractures remain a persistent cause of excessive morbidity, reduced life quality and premature mortality among elderly [6].

The incidence of hip fractures is increasing and the annual number worldwide is estimated to rise from 1.7 million in 1990 to 6.3 million by the year 2050 [7]. This will be a major challenge to the health care system and society. Most hip fractures are related to osteoporosis [8]. The cumulated risk for hip fracture is 20% for an 80-year-old woman and almost 50% for a 90-year-old woman [9].

In elderly fracture neck of femur are frequent and typically result from mild to moderate trauma in osteoporotic bones while in young adults these fractures are generally due to high energy trauma, such as road accidents. This is mainly because elderly people are unable to dissipate energy as compared to the young person and diminished ambulatory speed. Their protective responses are also diminished because of slow reaction time, weakness, disorientation and the side effect of medication [10].

Hip fractures in elderly patients are serious injuries that can lead to immobility and permanent dependence, negatively impacting patients’ quality of life and resulting in a financial burden for health systems and societies [11]. Hip fractures can also lead to death. Mortality rates among the elderly following hip fractures range from 14% to 36% within 1 year of the injury. During the first three months after hip fracture, elderly patients have a 5- to 8-fold increased risk of dying. The increased mortality risk persists up to ten years. Because of a predicted increase in life expectancy in western countries over the next decades, hip fractures and their consequences will have an even larger impact on health systems and societies in the future [12].

Fractures of the femoral neck are a devastating injury that extends far beyond the musculoskeletal trauma, with significant long-term consequences for the quality of life of both patients and carers. The fractures are common in the elderly. Patient care is complex, requiring multidisciplinary teams and integrated care pathways. Patients above the age of 90 represent a challenging subgroup as they have a number of concurrent medical co-morbidities, and are susceptible to postoperative complications and poorer outcomes [13].

Fracture neck of femur pose a number of management dilemmas depending on the age, sex, nutritional status, co-morbidities, status of the bones and type of fractures. Advanced age and associated co-morbidities are two decisive factors of mortality secondary to fracture neck of femur.

Poor nutritional status is known to be both a common causative factor of fracture neck of femur and predictor of excess mortality following surgical intervention. Many methods including anthropometry, the mini nutritional assessment, nutrition-related blood parameters and dietary analysis are used for nutritional status assessment in clinics. Serum albumin and total lymphocyte count are two of the most important blood parameters for nutritional status and have been recognized as prognostic factors of fracture neck femur.

Hip fractures in the elderly lead to functional decline and a diminished quality of life. Furthermore, these fractures are associated with an in-hospital mortality rate of 7–14%, reaching 14–36% within 1 year of surgery. Hip fractures are also complicated by a 0–49% need for revision surgery, which is influenced heavily by fracture characteristics and surgical interventions [14].

Factors that influence prognosis of elderly patients after hip fracture are age, gender, co-morbidities, anticoagulation therapy, and general physical health status at the time of injury. Furthermore, timing of surgery is thought to play an important role regarding survival. Although international clinical practice guidelines recommend surgical treatment of acute hip fracture within 24 to 48 hours after admission, these recommendations are still discussed controversially. Some researchers argue that early surgery can lead to an increased risk of peri-operative complications, including pneumonia, deep venous thrombosis, bleeding, pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infections and decubital ulcerations because clinicians do not have enough time to optimise patients’ medical conditions preoperatively [15]. 

Thus, the present study was carried out to analyse the effect of BMI, Bone density and co-morbidities on the outcome and mortality among elderly patients (60 years & above) undergoing surgical intervention for fracture neck of femur in the department of Orthopedics at Dr RPGMC Tanda.

The present study, an open cohort, prospective study, was conducted in patients with fractures neck of femur (age 60 years and above) presenting to the Department of Orthopaedics, Dr RPGMC Kangra at Tanda and undergoing surgical intervention.

All cases presenting to the department and fulfilling the criteria were studied for a period of one year starting from the date of start of the study. In first six months all patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were recruited and followed up for next six months. The last patient was recruited 6 months from the day of start of study.

The study was initiated following approval from Institutional Ethics Committee. The patients were given the right to abstain from participation in the study or to withdraw at any time of the study without reprisal.

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients of age ≥60 yrs with fracture neck of femur undergoing surgical intervention

• Those giving consent for inclusion in the study

Exclusion criteria

• Concomitant trauma involving other systems

• Associated fracture of the pelvis

• Bilateral hip fracture

• Pathological fracture

• Who do not give consent

Evaluation and Classification

For classification of co-morbidities in the study population, the American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) score was used.

After a detailed history, patients were clinically evaluated at the time of admission and details on socio-demographic data of the patients such as age, sex, socio- economic status were recorded according to the Udai Pareek or Kuppuswamy scale for patients from rural or urban area respectively.

All data regarding pre-existing co-morbidities, type of fracture, degree of osteoporosis and type of surgical procedure, hospital stay and perioperative mortality and condition of patient at the time of admission and discharge were collected using the following indices.

After surgery, patients were discharged on the fourth day if the clinical conditions permitted. The telephone number of the investigator was written on the discharge card. The patients were followed up in Orthopedics OPD on the 15^th postoperative day for sutures removal and further on 3^rd month and 6^th month postoperative day for assessment of outcome using defined indices as annexure number 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8.

The patient or their attendant were also contacted on phone by the investigator regarding the welfare of the patient every 15th day.

At the time of discharge the attendant were requested to inform the well- being of the patient to the investigator on the telephone mentioned on discharge card.

All patients reported as dead during the period of study were evaluated using the verbal autopsy performa (Annexure). The queries enquired by the investigator investigated the attributable factors for mortality such as death, major cardiac or pulmonary complications, deep vein thrombosis, urinary tract complications, blood loss, surgical wound complications etc.

Statistical Analysis

The data were presented as frequency, percentages or mean±SD whereas applicable. Student t-test was used to compare continuous variables between 2 groups. Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. P value <0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed using Epi Info version 3.4.3.

A total of 84 patients with fracture neck of femur were included in the study over a period of one year.

Majority 57.1% (n = 48/84) of the patients were males. Our study observed that majority of the patients (n = 49/84; 58.3%) were in age- group 61-70 years followed by 28.6% (n = 24/84) patients in 71-80 years and 9.5% (n = 8/84 in 81-90 years. Only three patients (3.6%) were aged above 90 years. According to Udai Pareek scale, 35.7% (30/84) of these patients were in class IV while 34.5% (29/84) patients each were in class III. There were 12 (14.3%) and 13 (15.5%) patients in class I and II respectively. Mean±SD BMI of the patients was 22.33±1.95 Kg/m² with a minimum BMI of 18.6 and maximum BMI of 26 Kg/m².

Table 1: Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Enrolled Patients

Table 2: Bone Density Measurement (Singh’s Index)

Table 3: Distribution of Patients on Basis of Diagnosis

Table 4: Distribution of Patients on Basis of Survival

Singh’s Index

Table 6 & figure 6 gives the bone density measurement as per Singh’s Index. Bone density measurement by Singh’s 

index showed that 4/84 patients were in grade 1 and grade 2 each. Majority of the patients (32.1%; 27/84) were in grade 4 while 22.6% (19/84) patients were in grade 6. There were 12/84(14.3%) patients in grade 3 and 18/84(21.4%) in grade 5.

Body Mass Index (BMI)

Table 2 summarizes BMI of the study participants. Mean±SD BMI of the patients was 22.33± 1.95 Kg/m² with a minimum BMI of 18.6 and maximum BMI of 26 Kg/m².

Mortality

Table 4 summarizes the mortality of the patients after 9^th month and 12^th month. In our study, 1 (1.2%) patient died after 9^th month of surgery. Overall mortality during 1 year was 7.14%. Further, the patients were compared on the basis if they could not survive within 9 months of surgery (group A), could not survive between 9 months to 12 months of surgery (group B), and survived until final follow-up (group C).

Table 6 summarizes comparison of laboratory investigations between the groups. Our study observed that Hb and TLC were comparable between the groups.

Our study observed that single patient in-group A had grade 3. In group B 2 patients had  grade 1 and there were 1 patient each of grade 2 and grade 6. Singh’s index was found to be statistically significant between the groups (p = 0.001).

Table 6: Effect of Lab Parameters in Differential Outcome 

Table 7: Singh’s Index Grading of Patients in All Groups

In our study, age, sex, economic status, BMI and Singh’s index were comparable in the non-survivors and survived patients. Bone mineral density was significantly associated with mortality with p value of <0.001. The bone mineral density (BMD) starts falling with increasing age especially in postmenopausal women due to loss of protective effect of estrogen on bone mineralization [16].

Peri-operative mortality in our study was 5.95%. In a cohort study by Ramanathan TS [17] from August 2001 to May 2003, they reported mortality of 10.2% in one year. The increased mortality in their study can be due to the time of their study which was 17 years back and in present study there are better equipments and medications which decrease the associated factors leading to mortality. Study by Shin HJ et al. [85] in 2013-2015 reported one year mortality of 15.1% in femoral neck fractures which is again higher than that observed by us which can be due to the reason that they enrolled patients of age more than 64 years. Another study by Higashikawa T [18] in 2016-2017 reported one year mortality of 11.6% in patients of age more than 65 years.

A meta-analysis reported that the absolute risk of dying within 12 months was 21% in patients who had surgery after 48 hours and 17% in patients who had surgery within 48 hours resulting in a 20% smaller long-term mortality risk in patients operated on within 48 hours [19].

Foss and Kehlet studied 300 hip fracture patients. They reported that Thirty-day mortality was 13.3% (40 patients) and the total peri-operative mortality was 15.6% (47 patients). Low postoperative mortality rates in our study could be associated with selective patient intake, exclusion of patients with pathological fractures, exclusion of patients sustaining fracture while in hospital, exclusion of patients receiving conservative fracture treatment, and finally insufficient follow-up especially after early discharge or transfer to secondary rehabilitation units [20].

Studies reported that an overall mortality rate of 20% to 30% is reported in the majority of the literature in patients that suffer a femoral neck fracture [21-22].

One present study reported a mean survival of 29 months and of the 19% of patients in this study who were deceased on follow-up, there was no difference by gender. Diamond et al. reported that men of advanced age who presented with a femoral neck fracture had a greater rate of mortality than women [23]. Of note, the results of the present study were that 10% of study patients lived less than 2 months after hip fracture and 32% lived less than one year [24].

Fransen et al. reported that femoral neck fractures in men implied a greater risk of death or being institutionalized within 2 years after the fracture [25-26].

Our results also demonstrated that the risk of death increased by 4 times as age increased, with female preponderance with p value of 0.029. Butler et al. [27] in their review of the literature demonstrated that age, gender, cognitive impairment and functional capacity prior to injury were associated with mortality rate. This was affirmed by Erickson et al. [28] who found that 90% of the deaths in their population occurred in patients greater than 75 years of age.

In our study, age, sex, economic status, BMI and Singh’s index were comparable in the non-survivors and survived patients. Bone mineral density was significantly associated with mortality with p value of <0.001. The bone mineral density (BMD) starts falling with increasing age especially in postmenopausal women due to loss of protective effect of estrogen on bone mineralization [29].

Mean BMI of the patients was 22.33±1.95 Kg/m2 with a range from 18.6 to 26 Kg/m2. Bone density measurement by Singh’s index shows that majority of the patients (32.1%; n = 27) were in grade 4 while 22.6% (n = 19) patients were in grade 6 and 21.4% (n = 18) in grade 5. There were four (4.8%) patients in grade 1 and 2. 52.4% (n = 44) had fracture of right femur while remaining 47.6% (n = 40) patents had fracture of left femur. The BMI, Bone density and other lab parameters affect the outcome of fracture neck femur and should be considered while operating.

1. Brauer, C.A. et al. "Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the united states." JAMA, vol. 302, no. 14, 2009, pp. 1573–1579.

2. Jiang, H.X. et al. "Development and initial validation of a risk score for predicting in-hospital and 1-year mortality in patients with hip fractures." Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 20, no. 3, 2005, pp. 494–500.

3. Forsh, D.A. and T.A. Ferguson. "Contemporary management of femoral neck fractures: the young and the old." Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, vol. 5, no. 3, 2012, pp. 214–221.

4. Verettas, D.A. et al. "Fractures of the proximal part of the femur in patients under 50 years of age." Injury, vol. 33, no. 1, 2002, pp. 41–45.

5. Farooq, M.A. et al. "Intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck in younger patients." Irish Journal of Medical Science, vol. 174, no. 4, 2005, pp. 42–45.

6. Marks, R. "Physical activity and hip fracture disability: a review." journal of aging research, vol. 3, 2011, pp. 1–7.

7. cooper, c. et al. "Hip Fractures in the Elderly: A World-Wide Projection." Osteoporosis International, vol. 2, 1992, pp. 285–289.

8. Cummings, S.R. et al. "Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. study of osteoporotic fractures research group." New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 332, 1995, pp. 767–773.

9. Zetterberg, C. et al. "Epidemiology of hip fractures in goteborg, sweden, 1940–1983." Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1984, pp. 43–52.

10. Babhulkar, S. "Management of trochanteric fractures." Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, vol. 40, no. 4, 2006, pp. 210–218.

11. Leal, J. et al. "Impact of hip fracture on hospital care costs: A Population-Based Study." Osteoporosis International, vol. 27, no. 2, 2016, pp. 549–558.

12. Kanis, J.A. et al. "A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide." Osteoporosis International, vol. 23, 2012, pp. 2239–2256.

13. Marques, A., et al. "The burden of osteoporotic hip fractures in portugal: costs, health related quality of life and mortality." Osteoporosis International, vol. 26, 2015, pp. 2623–2630.

14. Tan, L.T. et al. "Inpatient cost for hip fracture patients managed with an orthogeriatric care model in singapore." Singapore Medical Journal, vol. 58, 2017, pp. 139–144.

15. Lyons, A.R. "Clinical outcomes and treatment of hip fractures." American Journal of Medicine, vol. 103, no. 2A, 1997, pp. 51S–63S; discussion 63S–64S.

16. Panula, J. et al. "Mortality and cause of death in hip fracture patients aged 65 or older – a population-based study." BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 12, 2011, p. 105.

17. Lizaur-Utrilla, A. et al. "Early surgery within 2 days for hip fracture is not reliable as healthcare quality indicator." Injury, vol. 47, no. 7, 2016, pp. 1530–1535.

18. Schnell, S. et al. "The 1-year mortality of patients treated in a hip fracture program for elders." Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation, vol. 1, 2010, pp. 6–14.

19. Zuckerman, J.D. "Hip fracture." New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 334, 1996, pp. 1519–1525.

20. Morrison, R.S. et al. "The medical consultant’s role in caring for patients with hip fracture." Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 128, 1998, pp. 1010–1020.

21. Parker, M. and A. Johansen. "Hip Fracture." BMJ, vol. 333, 2006, pp. 27–30.

22. Haleem, S. et al. "Mortality following hip fracture: trends and geographical variations over the last 40 years." Injury, vol. 39, 2008, pp. 1157–1163.

23. Tolppanen, A.M. et al. "Comparison of predictors of hip fracture and mortality after hip fracture in community-dwellers with and without alzheimer’s disease – exposure-matched cohort study." BMC Geriatrics, vol. 16, 2016, p. 204.

24. Haentjens, P. et al. "Meta-analysis: Excess mortality after hip fracture among older women and men." Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 152, no. 6, 2010, pp. 380–390.

25. Robustillo, S.A. et al. Eurostat Demography Report - Short Analytical Web Note 3/2015. 2015.

26. Xu, J. et al. Mortality in the United States, 2015. NCHS Data Brief, no. 267, 2016.

27. OECD. Health at a Glance 2015: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing, 2015.

28. Clayer, M.T. and R.J. Bauze. "Morbidity and mortality following fractures of the femoral neck and trochanteric region: analysis of risk factors." Journal of Trauma, vol. 29, no. 12, 1989, pp. 1673–1678.

29. Major, L.J. and J.B. North. "Predictors of mortality in patients with femoral neck fracture." Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, vol. 24, no. 2, 2016, pp. 150–152.